Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

carolinayellowdog

(3,247 posts)
Sat Jan 24, 2015, 12:11 PM Jan 2015

"New Atheists are Wrong about Islam-- Here's How Data Proves it"-- Elias Isquith, Salon

I just noticed this article which appeared Thursday on Salon.com. The title is regrettable for an OP here, and I'd have preferred to call it "Muslims are not as distinctive as many think, a new study shows." But DU doesn't allow us to change article titles, so I'll just ask that people engage the content of the article and not the title. These paras summarize the research findings:


I found that Muslims in general are less distinctive than many of us think. In many ways there is really very little difference between Muslims and everybody else. Sometimes I use “everybody else” as the reference category, and sometimes I use Christians in particular, because Christianity and Islam are by far the world’s biggest faith traditions…

Even in some areas in which we expect … I didn’t find a great deal of difference. For example, many people think that Muslims are really intent on fusing religious and political authority, that there’s really no room in Islamic thinking for independent civic sphere that is not run by religious authorities, and in which religious authority and doctrine predominate, meaning there’s little room for an independent civil society and public sphere. Well, I found in this survey data that … Muslims and Christians don’t differ very much on this question, and that most Muslims, once one controls for everything that needs to be controlled for in these statistical analyses, actually do not want to fuse religious and political authority…

Some, of course, do. Some absolutely do. But some Christians do as well … There are many American Christians who are skeptical about dividing church and state rigorously. That’s true for many Muslims as well. But a majority of both Christians and Muslims seem to embrace at least some separation of sacred and secular in politics. That’s one finding that was perhaps surprising and also showed that Muslims are less distinctive than we might think.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"New Atheists are Wrong about Islam-- Here's How Data Proves it"-- Elias Isquith, Salon (Original Post) carolinayellowdog Jan 2015 OP
Interesting piece. Starboard Tack Jan 2015 #1
It seemed like a troll magnet carolinayellowdog Jan 2015 #3
I used to think Hinduism and Bhuddism were more tolerant too Starboard Tack Jan 2015 #4
Because my friend, it is not about belief or non-belief. TM99 Jan 2015 #7
So true. Starboard Tack Jan 2015 #8
Actually the only place you can't change the title is LBN. cbayer Jan 2015 #2
subtitle is good: "New empirical evidence shows anti-Islam crusaders misunderstand Muslim countries" carolinayellowdog Jan 2015 #6
This seems to happen a lot with minority or foreign groups when they're looked at closely. okasha Jan 2015 #5

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
1. Interesting piece.
Sat Jan 24, 2015, 01:42 PM
Jan 2015

I'm not sure why you find the title "unfortunate". It seems quite apt after listening to and reading what some of the NA blowhards have to say.

carolinayellowdog

(3,247 posts)
3. It seemed like a troll magnet
Sat Jan 24, 2015, 02:21 PM
Jan 2015

The gist of the research is that a great many of us misunderstand the extent of difference between Muslims and "others"-- seems like Isquith has a particular issue with New Atheism, but Fish pays at least as much attention to Christian belief of vast differences. My own past biases haven't been either pro-Christian or pro-atheist, but I used to think Hinduism was more tolerant and peaceful than Islam. A long trip to India, encountering Sikhs, Jains, and Buddhists as well as Muslims and Hindus, led to a questioning of that bias. So has a couple of decades of subsequent history. I'm curious to find out what Fish might have learned about Hindu levels of belief in church/state separation, as contrasted to Muslims. In India I'd assume the Muslims are more emphatic about it since a Hindu theocratic government would be against their interest.

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
4. I used to think Hinduism and Bhuddism were more tolerant too
Sat Jan 24, 2015, 03:38 PM
Jan 2015

I'm no longer so sure of that, especially when following current events in India and Burma. I also used to think atheism promoted the most tolerance, but movements such as the New Atheists give me serious pause, in that regard. I find it increasingly more difficult to listen to those who essentially share my beliefs, or lack thereof, concerning the existence of God and Creation, as they bluster on about the evils of Islam. Singling out one religion seems to be the theme. Muslims are the easy target right now.

Bottom line is, no belief system has a lock on tolerance. It is something we either aspire to as individuals, or something that we reject out of our fear of "the other".

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
7. Because my friend, it is not about belief or non-belief.
Sat Jan 24, 2015, 09:30 PM
Jan 2015

It is about flawed human beings promoting all sorts of screwed up ideologies from nationalism (which is what has made Buddhists and Hindu's in those regions act against their teachings) to religious justifications for bigotry to the very narcissistic and solipsistic certainty that all must think like me or they are ignorant 'others'.

Us versus them! Primate dominance games didn't stop just because we evolved a frontal cortex.

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
8. So true.
Sun Jan 25, 2015, 11:11 AM
Jan 2015

The need to be right, when we can learn so much from accepting that fact that we are so often wrong. Even when we are right, we are usually wrong to a degree. Dogma, be it religious or political, tends to exclude the grey areas, not to mention color.

So sorry to hear about your dad. My thoughts are with you. Sounds like you have a wonderful relationship with him.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
2. Actually the only place you can't change the title is LBN.
Sat Jan 24, 2015, 02:06 PM
Jan 2015

So if you wanted to post it in religion with a revised title, you can. I would probably add a note saying that I changed the title on purpose to be less inflammatory.

carolinayellowdog

(3,247 posts)
6. subtitle is good: "New empirical evidence shows anti-Islam crusaders misunderstand Muslim countries"
Sat Jan 24, 2015, 04:58 PM
Jan 2015

but I prefer to instigate discussions here rather than places where argument is more typical than discussion. Thanks for the tip re OPs and LBN titles. Isquith's article title is click-bait, but I think a disservice to the researcher who doesn't seem to be focused much on New Atheists. The research isn't all that new, though-- the book Are Muslims Distinctive? was given a Choice award as an outstanding academic title in 2012 according to the author's webpage at Berkeley.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
5. This seems to happen a lot with minority or foreign groups when they're looked at closely.
Sat Jan 24, 2015, 04:24 PM
Jan 2015

They turn out to be "just like everybody else" in every way that matters.

I remember an article--long enough ago that I think it was in Life, maybe about the time of the Anita Bryant pogroms--about a gay couple who had adopted ten or twelve special needs kids. When the writer asked what the men would like the reader's takeaway to be, one said, "We're just like any other parents. We have washing machines, too."

(Quote from memory. Not swearing to exact wording.)

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Interfaith Group»"New Atheists are Wr...