Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Interfaith Group
Related: About this forumNY judge tosses lawsuit over Sept. 11 steel cross
http://online.wsj.com/article/AP1b0ea1cbb19d430c824f3222dd24b4ba.htmlUpdated March 29, 2013, 3:22 p.m. ET
Associated Press
NEW YORK A judge has tossed out a lawsuit that sought to stop the display of a cross-shaped steel beam found among the World Trade Center's rubble, saying the artifact could help tell the story of the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
U.S. District Judge Deborah Batts in a ruling released publicly Friday rejected the arguments of American Atheists, which had sued the National September 11 Memorial & Museum's operators in 2011 on constitutional grounds, contending that the prominent display of the cross constitutes an endorsement of Christianity, diminishing the contributions of non-Christian rescuers.
Batts wrote that the cross and its accompanying panels of text "helps demonstrate how those at ground zero coped with the devastation they witnessed during the rescue and recovery effort." She called its purpose "historical and secular" and noted that it will be housed at the museum in the "Finding Meaning at Ground Zero" section with placards explaining its meaning and the reason for its inclusion. It also will be surrounded by secular artifacts.
"No reasonable observer would view the artifact as endorsing Christianity," the judge said. She added that the museum's creators "have not advanced religion impermissibly, and the cross does not create excessive entanglement between the state and religion." She said the plaintiffs also failed to allege any form of intentional discrimination or cite any adverse or unequal treatment on the basis of their religious beliefs.
more at link
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 2309 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NY judge tosses lawsuit over Sept. 11 steel cross (Original Post)
cbayer
Mar 2013
OP
zbdent
(35,392 posts)1. A side note to the idea of the "cross-shaped" steel beam ...
My point, during all the psychotic injection of Religion into the tragedy of 9/11, was that it would be hard to NOT find a "cross" of steel beams in the wreckage ... hardly a "miracle".
cbayer
(146,218 posts)2. Isn't that the truth. This particular pair of beams took on
some significance for some. Not surprising. I can't even imagine being there, but having had an area for some could find some solace must have been a good thing.
goldent
(1,582 posts)3. A frivolous lawsuit in my view
cbayer
(146,218 posts)4. Agree. I am not surprised at all that they tossed it.
I am strongly in favor of separation issues generally, but this was an entirely different thing, imo.