Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Cannabis
Related: About this forumFederal Medical Marijuana Bill a Mixed Bag
Last edited Thu May 14, 2015, 08:40 PM - Edit history (1)
Cross posting this from Drug Policy:
For copyright adherence, I skipped the good and am just quoting the concerns. I have been railing about rescheduling for eons to allow for more extensive studies, but this brings up a point I hadn't considered. For those interested in the topic, this article is a great read.
[snip]
But unfortunately, changing the status in CSA may bring more problems than solutions.
The states have regulated cannabis without any federal oversight whatsoever. Agencies like the DEA, FDA, Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP), National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) and National Institute of Health (NIH) have been unable to impose extra rules or influence local regulations.
Move cannabis down in the schedule scheme, even one notch, and all the agencies listed above would suddenly have tremendous power over every aspect of the plant. The acronyms would come with their own armies of lawyers and lobbyists well honed in the realm of big medicine, pharma and government.
Moving marijuana to Schedule II may actually undo the state-level marijuana reform laws by putting the federal government back in the driver's seat. Alcohol and tobacco are not in the CSA. No Schedule II drugs (which include cocaine and Oxycontin) are legally sold for recreation.
[snip]
But unfortunately, changing the status in CSA may bring more problems than solutions.
The states have regulated cannabis without any federal oversight whatsoever. Agencies like the DEA, FDA, Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP), National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) and National Institute of Health (NIH) have been unable to impose extra rules or influence local regulations.
Move cannabis down in the schedule scheme, even one notch, and all the agencies listed above would suddenly have tremendous power over every aspect of the plant. The acronyms would come with their own armies of lawyers and lobbyists well honed in the realm of big medicine, pharma and government.
Moving marijuana to Schedule II may actually undo the state-level marijuana reform laws by putting the federal government back in the driver's seat. Alcohol and tobacco are not in the CSA. No Schedule II drugs (which include cocaine and Oxycontin) are legally sold for recreation.
[snip]
Of course, there is another option, one that could (and should) still be considered. In order for federalism to truly prevail marijuana should be completely removed from the Controlled Substances Act.
This, please.
Read more at http://www.philly.com/philly/columnists/philly420/1st_medical_marijuana_bill_introduced_in_US_Senate.html#p75fEYKkRufiH46R.99
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1392 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Federal Medical Marijuana Bill a Mixed Bag (Original Post)
Ruby the Liberal
May 2015
OP
"marijuana should be completely removed from the Controlled Substances Act"
Warren DeMontague
May 2015
#1
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)1. "marijuana should be completely removed from the Controlled Substances Act"
Yes. Absolutely.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,305 posts)2. I thought legalization would bring relief
Didn't think about the side effects of legislators playing Doctor on 'approved conditions' and the Feds meddling with God-knows what crap are in their bylaws.
Fast becoming an all-or-none, back-the-fuck-off proponent as opposed to applauding the small victories on this.
Its not a happy place. This is insane.