Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumThe False Narratives Used to Try to Derail Bernie's Army
CommonDreams: The False Narratives Used to Try to Derail Bernie's Army:
"The most damning criticisms of Our Revolution in a new Politico piece are unquoted and unsourced"
On Monday, Politico ran a piece on the Bernie Sanders founded organization, Our Revolution, titled Bernies Army in Disarray, a pre-conceived, yet inevitable narrative that Sanders movement is somehow ineffective and failing. The new article, a follow-up to their May 29, 2017 piece Sanders revolution hits a rough patch, utilizes anonymous sourcing and various false comparisons to develop an unfavorable narrative to Bernie Sanders and Our Revolution.
.............//snip
A fundraising shortfall by Our Revolution in favor of former Virginia Governor candidate Tom Perriello is used to demonstrate the organizations inability to fundraise from Bernie Sanders 2016 lists; a promised $150,000 campaign haul only managed to come up with under $50,000 for the candidate. Omitted is that Tom Perriello, who was also endorsed by Clinton Campaign Chair John Podesta, had little name recognition and had difficulty portraying himself as a progressive outsider with a background working in the Obama Administration and Washington DC. It's misleading to attribute a fundraising shortfall for a candidate solely to Our Revolution without addressing the candidate and their campaign itself.
.............//snip
The most damning criticisms of Our Revolution in the Politico piece are unquoted and unsourced. An organization in disarray, and failing in its mission, are among the characteristics attributed to the organization, though what evidence offered to substantiate such characterizations are downright false or grossly mischaracterized. Its purely speculative how one can look at the popularity of Bernie Sanders and successes progressives have made in pushing the Democratic Party to the left and making formidable to successful challenges in primaries and general elections and conclude Our Revolutions mission is failing, regardless of the debatable role theyve played in it.
.............//snip
Support for Bernie Sanders and progressive politics will never translate to ubiquitous uniformity among grassroots activists, elected officials, and organizers. Despite this, the consensus among progressives is far from disarray or an attitude toward Our Revolution that the group is failing.
You know what would happen if I tried to post this anywhere else on DU!
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1058 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (11)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The False Narratives Used to Try to Derail Bernie's Army (Original Post)
LongTomH
May 2018
OP
Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)1. The Our Revolution faction of our local Democratic party has become an equal in terms of influence.
And is gaining more and more control all the time.
mountain grammy
(27,273 posts)2. Good article. Thanks for posting.
Referring to Nina Turner as Bernies Omarosa." I've never seen that. I'm actually surprised I've not seen it here, but I mostly avoid those threads, and I should, as I was censored a little while back.
That's an extremely offensive thing to say about a woman who was elected to office and who's fought hard for progress and I wonder if it would even be hidden here.
disillusioned73
(2,872 posts)3. It's only gonna get worse..
I only come here for the establishment perspective anymore.. although I get a heads up on twitter which way the winds are trending
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,544 posts)4. Yes, we know... thanks for posting here.