Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Martin O'Malley
Related: About this forum"O'Malley laid out an aggressive, moral case for tackling climate change. Let's hope it catches on"
The Pope is a tough act to follow, but Martin OMalley made a good show of it. Last week, on the same day that the pontiff released his new encyclical calling for a global effort to combat climate change, OMalley released his own plan for reducing emissions and staving off global climate catastrophe. Its an aggressive platform that frames the fight against climate change as a moral imperative, rather than simply a question of science and economics, and in an op-ed for USA Today, the former governor of Maryland said that climate change is at the center of my campaign for president.
Well hot damn, Martin. As the Huffington Posts Kate Sheppard notes, the OMalley plan sets a very high standard for other Democratic candidates to meet. He directly rejects the all of the above energy policy favored by the White House (and quite a few Republicans) and instead calls for an end to the use of fossil fuels within the next 35 years. In keeping with the framing of climate change as a moral issue, OMalley makes a point that ending fossil fuel use is a public health imperative, and would extend the lives of 200,000 Americans each year. He also says outright that hed reject approval for the Keystone XL pipeline.
Well hot damn, Martin. As the Huffington Posts Kate Sheppard notes, the OMalley plan sets a very high standard for other Democratic candidates to meet. He directly rejects the all of the above energy policy favored by the White House (and quite a few Republicans) and instead calls for an end to the use of fossil fuels within the next 35 years. In keeping with the framing of climate change as a moral issue, OMalley makes a point that ending fossil fuel use is a public health imperative, and would extend the lives of 200,000 Americans each year. He also says outright that hed reject approval for the Keystone XL pipeline.
Rest of the article by Simon Maloy of Salon here:
http://www.salon.com/2015/06/22/this_is_what_a_real_climate_plan_looks_like_martin_omalleys_bold_approach_sets_the_standard/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1270 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"O'Malley laid out an aggressive, moral case for tackling climate change. Let's hope it catches on" (Original Post)
FSogol
Jun 2015
OP
Raine1967
(11,607 posts)1. Very happy to K&R this.
When people start to pay attention, (and they will) they will see that there are stark differences between the candidates.
I am going to redirect to another thread here in the group: http://www.democraticunderground.com/1281642
IT's not just crucial that we have a solid plan (as MO'M does) if will benefit the nation.
FSogol
(46,433 posts)2. Yeah, that's true. It would create so many good jobs, our economy
would get a massive boost similar to the computer revolution.
elleng
(135,882 posts)4. Exactly, and the non-environmentalists have studiously ignored it
because it would burden their dear carbon-related funders.
elleng
(135,882 posts)3. Thanks. I xposted the article
in 'Environment.'