Martin O'Malley
Related: About this forumO'Malley: Rallying around Clinton a 'big mistake.'
MANCHESTER, New Hampshire (CNN) Martin O'Malley took one of the hardest swings of any Democrat yet at Hillary Clinton on Thursday, saying the party shouldn't be "circling the wagons" around the former secretary of state and questioning her viability against Republicans.
The former Maryland governor -- struggling to climb out of low single digits in national Democratic primary polls -- said Clinton will continue to be dogged by her use of a personal email address on a private server during her tenure as America's top diplomat.
"Until we start having debates, our party's going to be defined and branded by questions like: What did Secretary Clinton know, when did she know it, and when will the FBI conclude its investigation?" O'Malley told reporters in New Hampshire. "That's not a formula for success in the fall."
O'Malley went further than other Democratic presidential candidates have. Clinton's top-polling challenger, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, has avoided direct intra-party attacks and instead trained his fire on Wall Street and Republicans.
He also criticized the Democratic National Committee for scheduling only six debates, saying those nationally-televised events are opportunities for the party to focus on big ideas, rather than Clinton's email drama.
"I think it's a big mistake for us as a party to circle the wagons around the inevitable frontrunner," O'Malley said Thursday. . .
O'Malley, who endorsed Clinton over President Barack Obama in the 2008 Democratic presidential primary, said Thursday that he doesn't think "a resort to one of the older names is going to move us forward."
He also attempted to tie Clinton to Wall Street -- one of the most popular targets on the Democratic campaign trail this year.
"I am not the candidate awash in big Wall Street money. That is not my niche," he said. "The Clintons are probably the most formidable fundraising couple that any republic in the history of the planet has ever created."
Still, he offered Clinton some cover on questions of her trustworthiness, saying: "I know Secretary Clinton, and I supported her eight years ago. I have a great deal of admiration for her on a personal level and a professional level. She's never said anything to me that I could not rely on. And in all of my personal dealings with her, I've found her to be forthright and honest."
O'Malley had also criticized Clinton in an interview with the New Hampshire radio station WGIR earlier Thursday.
http://www.wdsu.com/politics/omalley-rallying-around-clinton-a-big-mistake/34949276
JustAnotherGen
(33,444 posts)I think it is going to be a problem when non political junkies start paying attention next fall. In a General Election our candidate needs to be flawless.
I also tend to agree with him on this statement - though I did not support her in 2008.
"I know Secretary Clinton, and I supported her eight years ago. I have a great deal of admiration for her on a personal level and a professional level. She's never said anything to me that I could not rely on. And in all of my personal dealings with her, I've found her to be forthright and honest."
She's good - I would canvass for her. However, it's going to be an uphill battle if she's the nominee with centrists and moderates.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Can't agree. Martin just gained a point and lost a point.
Koinos
(2,798 posts)That is to be expected. Both of them regard Hillary Clinton as a personal friend, not an "enemy."
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Eduard Munch running across a bridge.
elleng
(135,883 posts)but trying to set the record straight.
Koinos
(2,798 posts)monmouth4
(10,118 posts)Koinos
(2,798 posts)In the long run, the DNC is making a big mistake. They think it will help Hillary, but it will not. And it certainly won't help the American people appreciate the chasm between democrats and republicans.
elleng
(135,883 posts)AND learn about the wealth of Dem candidates, which of course dnc doesn't WANT!