Imagine having three such wonderfully qualified choices?

My gut, for what it's worth, still says Amy. She has shown an ability to step up to the situation and overperform. Or maybe I'm just choosing the one with the loudest voice, which, like it or not, is important in a campaign.

Depends on how her husband does.
He was on a ventilator.

I hadn’t heard that. 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻

He is much better.
Possibly even home. I think its on her twitter feed.

She's good, don't get me wrong, but a "meh" choice.

She doesn't bring anything to ticket, IMO.

Forget the crap about motivating the base or expanding the playing field. We need to double down on the midwest. Nothing else matters in the slightest.

We are still severely underestimating how problematic those states are. White moderate swing voters will decide those states. There won't be an avalanche of turnout to the rescue.

I have hosted enough debate watching parties to know how Amy Klobuchar would be received by that type of voter as opposed to a barker like Kamala Harris.

Deny or ignore that at our own risk

I do hope it is not Klobuchar - for several reasons. She is not an strong environmentalist (she voted for Polymet mining - next door to the Boundary Waters), she is way too considerate of corporate interests, and also very much a hawk. I know that being a war-hawk is the usual stance for the majority of our national leaders, but I would like that to diminish - seriously get less as American moves from being a major Super-Power to an equal member of the world community.
Warren would make an awesome President (in the event that Joe doesn't finish his term, or chooses not to stand for a second term, however, maybe she would make an even more awesome Speaker of the Senate. Just imagine that energy, that positively, that clarity as Speaker. What a contrast with our current dystopian holder and in-actor of, what has turned out to be, the most powerful position in our government.
Of the three top choices, I would go for Harris. Given that it is way beyond time to have a women on the winning ticket, I also think it has to be a women of color - either African-American or Latinx. Both constituencies are strong Dem supporters, in particular the former, and this, in my opinion, has to be recognized, publicly recognized, action-taken recognized.
Would love Stacey Abrams too, even with her "lack of experience" (when has that stopped anyone from being elected - witness the current debacler and debaser of the Presidency). She is a vibrant, knowledgeable, indefatigable and inspiring speaker. She is a worker. And she is Progressive.
It is so great to have such a plethora of talent to choose from.

That just helps Trump saying that the Dems are nominating a candidate who may not survive his full term.

But the comments about Biden's age and health only helps Trump.

Ignoring it just makes it an even BIGGER issue

at talking point to use against Biden.

even Biden himself has hinted that he'd be a 1-term president.

If we do it, it is saying they are right and just helps them.

as much as we need to. Joe and his team are obviously handling this, and not by planning to keep his age-spotted head down and hope no one else mentions it.

but not repeating their talking points for them.

I am not a fan of hers at all.

Kamala Harris would be fine. Val Demings too. I also like Tammy Duckworth.

The person I like the most is Hilda Solis, the former Secretary of Labor.

who would help energize the African American vote. After that is would be Warren who would help attract progressives.

Unfortunately, all come from solid blue states and wouldn't help flip any swing states.

that she is from a solid blue state and doesn't help flip any swing states.

Besides, it’s the right time and the right thing to do.

No no no to Warren!

and there are more popular options, like Val Demings.

Her replacement in the Senate would be a repub and I just don't believe we need to be giving away Senate seats right now.

I'm of the opinion that a woman of color would be the best choice, possibly Kamala Harris.

Warren would be an excellent majority leader in the Senate, though.

She's from a solid blue state, won't help energize the African American vote or help attract progressives to the ticket.

She's progressive, young, articulate and had inner circle of experience.

I would prefer her first, Harris next.

All kinds of tea leaves in there but they're all different brands and pointing in different directions..LOL.

Whoever Biden ends up choosing there's gonna be some disappointment here as everybody seems to have their own personal favorite. But they'll just have to momentarily vent and then just accept it and close ranks ASAP. Trust Joe to pick a VP that he believes is most ready to be POTUS and whom he feels most comfortable working with. If you can't trust him to even pick a running mate then I'm not sure why you'd trust him to do anything else.

No matter who it is just remember who she'd be replacing to put things into perspective!

I’d rather not have any primary candidate as VP.

especially if one of them costs us a seat, as in massachusetts.

i loves me some warren, and no doubt she'd be great as vp or even president if it came to that, but we need her in the senate right now, not only to increase our chance of winning it, but beyond that, she'd be lioness of the senate if we get a majority.

after we win in Nov

Biden needs to consider Stacey Abrams.

CNN has a list of 10 potential VP candidates for Biden

https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/26/politics/joe-biden-kamala-harris-elizabeth-warren-amy-klobuchar/index.html

of a very minority party.

Choose Warren!

By choosing Warren now, it absolutely wont.

But the only way Biden isn't the nominee is either a scandal or something much more dire. The Veep pick can't make a sure thing any more of a sure thing.

A warren pick would be the best way to mitigate the shifting of opinion between now and when the rest of the delegates are chosen in June. Of course I have no idea what will happen, and I think there is a 99.9 chance biden gets the nomination. But choosing warren increases it to 1000% imho

Yes, I agree. It is your humble opinion a Warren pick somehow makes a sure thing more of a sure thing.

it won’t add anything.

We need a POC!!

a couple days ago when I was researching somebody else...

The 10 Most Popular and Unpopular Senators

https://morningconsult.com/senator-rankings/

Never woulda bet that Warren was one of the top 10 most unpopular Senators.

Anyway, there are 3 Gopper ones on that list that are all up for reelection so I hope that's 3 seats right there that we can pick up.

A 4th one is McConnell but that would just be too delicious to come true.

Looks like Bernie is very popular in his state...he should go back to representing them as the rest of the country doesn't quite seem to share Vermont's affection.

Personally

I had hopes for her in the GA election, but she is available now. And it wouldn't clear out a Senate seat.

Biden isn't going to pick a running mate who won't endorse him.

20+ years of age!

Period!

I am thinking Gov Whitmir might be better. We have to have Michigan and she should help with the other nearby states that we also need to win.

All are excellent choices

Yet, in this moment, we need Elizabeth Warren.

I did not think that a month ago.

It is obvious to me now. We will have to save Main Street and Senator Warren has multiple plans for that and can improvise rationally and effectively on the fly, in a crisis or even with green eggs and ham.