although he couched it as "influencing the platform'.

Bernie said his supporters should still vote for him in primaries, not for the nomination but for "leverage" for the platform at the convention. These people just took it further to say he can still get the nomination. They are probably the same people that said Joe would drop dead (for unknown reasons) and Bernie would take the nomination.

Only the nominee has leverage. What's his plan if the nom and leadership don't bend a knee and give him what he wants?

"leverage" since Biden's platform was clearly chosen by the sheer numbers. So what is the motive to diminish Biden voters participation while encouraging his supporters to continue voting. The duplicity is quite interesting...

I will give Bernie a bit of benefit of a doubt, especially after WI supreme court debacle. We need everyone to turn out and vote blue for down ballots. If Bernie is the only thing motivating them, at least it's a good thing they show up and vote blue.

defeats his whole claim to leverage. I've seen enough that it does make me wonder why the duplicity. The blowouts were quite a statement against him and maybe he wanted to mitigate that somehow.

Supposed to be nice to them. So you better beg people like that. (Not)

And in that case, he wouldn't collect ANY delegates.

But I'll bet $27.00 that he's still "collecting" campaign donations.

In the small far-left cliques where Sanders had his introduction to politics, party platforms, party manifestos, do matter, because there is little else the group does but wrangle over the platform. Its chief importance is not owed to any demand or proposal for action it contains, but simply to demonstrate who is on top in the clique, and who must accept being on the bottom, or calve off into a clique of their own.

Platforms of a major national party mean nothing. They do not serve as the basis for campaign efforts, they do not bind candidates elected to office in the Party's name. They are aspirational statements perhaps, but in fact are mostly something for delegates to busy themselves with before the big show of nomination by acclaim and the triumphant speeches of the candidates, which is what everyone comes for, along with the meeting of colleagues and the networking. The last meaningful platform fight in the Democratic Party was Mr. Hubert Humphrey's Civil Rights plank in 1948, which when approved kicked off the 'Dixiecrat' walk-out to put Strom Thurmond on the ballot as a Presidential candidate in competition with Mr. Truman.






"When things are not called by their right names, what is said cannot make sense. When what is said does not make sense, what is planned cannot succeed. When plans do not succeed, people become uneasy. When people are uneasy, punishments do not fit crimes. When punishments do not fit crimes, people cannot know where to put hand or foot."

It explains so much about the Jr. Senator from Vermont.

He said that his name will remain on the ballot so as to accumulate delegates and influence the platform.

That doesn't bother me as much as the fact that I still see some Bernie folks posting, "Bernie's still in this. Vote for him and maybe get a deadlocked convention. There's still hope!"

There's some real delusional thinking out there. Bernie has literally said "Joe Biden will be the nominee," but some people still don't get it.

Wishful thinking and confirmation bias is a very strong drug.

Link to tweet

It's the same attitude that many RWers display when they say that a woman who goes to an abortion clinic hasn't "really thought through" her decision, and needs "time to think" and be "presented with all the other options."

Doesn't show much respect for the Democratic voters who have shown up at the polls to make their decision known.

sink in their collective mind set.

Link to tweet

about delegates to mean he wanted to diminish the complete blowouts he was experiencing which was the key to Biden's delegate lead. Many Biden supporters might take him at his word and not show up, thereby closing the delegate gap, which he can then describe as "influence".

We know his supporters will still show up to vote.

I think he gave this strategy away when he clearly stated he was still collecting delegates. Disclaimer: I'm not on Twitter, but it seems I'm not the only one to find this whole development kinda fishy.

Both involves eliminating campaign activities. However, "suspending" allows a candidate to continue to raise funds (generally to pay off remaining expenses, but also to program for other races).

but have been concerned that all is/was not as was being stated

They've reported he's out. Good luck trying to change that message. Bernie isn't helping himself here.

These idiots on twitter don't know that every other candidate that dropped out has also "suspended" the campaign.

Hopefully people are not so stupid to believe this. He declared he is out of the race. Ballots often show names of people who have left the race. Think people! Think.

Democratic Socialists, too, with their little "rose" attached.

Is this tweet urging Sanders' supporters to vote for Bernie as a write-in candidate come November?

did last time.

Ignore them. They either want to see the end of Trump or they don't.

I don’t see how this is any different.



-Laelth

Urged supporters to continue voting for them, so they could have more 'leverage' at the convention. On past form, Sanders wants to be backed by disruption at the convention so he can strong-arm his way into concessions far greater than reasonable persons would seek, or allow if petitioned.

Other candidates simply employed the legal formula that allows them to continue soliciting funds to pay off their campaign committee's debts.





"When things are not called by their right names, what is said cannot make sense. When what is said does not make sense, what is planned cannot succeed. When plans do not succeed, people become uneasy. When people are uneasy, punishments do not fit crimes. When punishments do not fit crimes, people cannot know where to put hand or foot."

I don’t think that it will make a hill of beans worth of difference at the convention.

-Laelth

But threats are a delicate business.

The utterance of a threat is often more effective than its carrying out would be. The reality may fall short of future perils pictured in imagination.

It can be dangerous to threaten convincingly. Sometimes, people see no need to await another's pleasure, and strike pre-emptively to remove the threat.





"When things are not called by their right names, what is said cannot make sense. When what is said does not make sense, what is planned cannot succeed. When plans do not succeed, people become uneasy. When people are uneasy, punishments do not fit crimes. When punishments do not fit crimes, people cannot know where to put hand or foot."

... the OP mentions some “rumor” that Bernie merely suspended his campaign and didn’t withdraw from the race. I was merely pointing out that Elizabeth Warren’s campaign, for example, is also “suspended.” It’s not a rumor, nor is a mere suspension indicative of malicious intent. It’s standard procedure.

-Laelth

I responded by pointing out just how differently Bernie has handled his "suspension" from those other candidates.

Is that clearer?

As long as we agree that “suspending” one’s campaign is standard procedure and that the Twitter “rumor” alluded to in the OP is not a rumor. It’s the truth.

-Laelth

are the ones saying he is not out of the race, and their votes will actually have an effect on potential nomination.

No other candidate is telling their supporters to continue voting for them, so I believe Sanders is fine with this mistaken thinking among his supporters.

He has, on occasion, been non-responsive in correcting misinformation that he believes benefits him.

My argument is, principally, semantic.

-Laelth

Shades of ‘The South Shall Rise Again!’

He ended his campaign. Awww dah. Which is it? Bless their poor little hearts!!!!!

or not to familiar with reality.

Take a look how effective it is in this thread.

Explain to them they are wrong but if they want to vote for Bernie, it won't change the primary result.

We need to move forward.


Unity.

And no, we can't still vote for Bernie in November.

Like most candidated, he "suspended" his campaign.

Under campaign finance law, if a candidate withdraws, the money flow stops. The campaign stops.

If any candidate suspends, s/he can still accept donations, pay expenses, pay back personal loans.

I just saw in another thread that Senator Sanders is paying staff health care through October. A great gesture of support to his staff, but it is donations which will make the actual payments.

I believe that most, if not all of the other presidential candidates "suspended."

Urged supporters to continue voting for them, so they could have more 'leverage' at the convention. On past form, Sanders wants to be backed by disruption at the convention so he can strong-arm his way into concessions far greater than reasonable persons would seek, or allow if petitioned.

Other candidates simply employed the legal formula that allows them to continue soliciting funds to pay off their campaign committee's debts.





"When things are not called by their right names, what is said cannot make sense. When what is said does not make sense, what is planned cannot succeed. When plans do not succeed, people become uneasy. When people are uneasy, punishments do not fit crimes. When punishments do not fit crimes, people cannot know where to put hand or foot."

Thanks for posting. You are correct. I am strongly NOT in favor of the disgraceful behavior Senator Sanders and some of his supporters exhibited before and are exhibiting now. Your comments are spot on.

The other presidential candidates suspended and then personally endorsed, as they should.

Senator Sanders suspended and then... Um, well, duh... The Senator has not and will not be onboard until (or sadly, unless) he endorses Vice President Biden.

I was just surprised people didn't understand the difference between suspended and withdrew. It is purely a financial compliance issue.

A pleasure to make your acquaintance. Though a city sort, when I used to do distance running, there was a stretch alongside woods where there were often red-wing blackbirds to be seen. That little flash of scarlet is a charming sight.

Also a pleasure. I've read your posts and thank you for your service here. While I live in the woods in the burbs, those weren't the kind of birds which gave me my name. When I was active in the campaign world I helped remove Phil Crane, who was a 35-year back-bench repugnant seat-warmer in the House. Best race I was ever on.

That was some damn good news when it came through.