Cable News Clips

MagaSmash

(7,866 posts) Wed Oct 30, 2024, 11:29 AM 2 hrs ago

An Army of election officials ready to Reject the vote: NYT Magazine - Morning Joe

There is NO Widespread Election "fraud". It Does NOT Exist.

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

An Army of election officials ready to Reject the vote: NYT Magazine - Morning Joe (Original Post) MagaSmash 2 hrs ago OP

Wouldn't they be subject to prosecution no_hypocrisy 2 hrs ago #1

See my post #2. Nt Fiendish Thingy 2 hrs ago #3

Meanwhile, in the real world, here's how things really work: Fiendish Thingy 2 hrs ago #2

He lies...you are correct. There will be a few that will make noise and probably break the law. Go ahead..go PortTack 2 hrs ago #4

Bad faith "rejection" of voting results to gum up the machinery of democracy sounds like fraud to me. Beartracks 51 min ago #5

NYT just published an article dweller 17 min ago #6

no_hypocrisy

(48,500 posts)

1. Wouldn't they be subject to prosecution

Reply to MagaSmash (Original post)

Wed Oct 30, 2024, 11:33 AM

2 hrs ago

if they can’t justify their rejections?

Fiendish Thingy

(17,987 posts)

3. See my post #2. Nt

Reply to no_hypocrisy (Reply #1)

Wed Oct 30, 2024, 11:38 AM

2 hrs ago

Fiendish Thingy

(17,987 posts)

2. Meanwhile, in the real world, here's how things really work:

Reply to MagaSmash (Original post)

Wed Oct 30, 2024, 11:38 AM

2 hrs ago

https://www.citizensforethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/ElectionCertificationUnderThreat-2.pdf

All the swing state laws, regulations and legal remedies, many already used in previous elections, to deal with rogue elections officials who refuse to certify results.

PortTack

(34,366 posts)

4. He lies...you are correct. There will be a few that will make noise and probably break the law. Go ahead..go

Reply to Fiendish Thingy (Reply #2)

Wed Oct 30, 2024, 11:58 AM

2 hrs ago

To jail! We’re all ready for you loons to go away…and you will, one way or another.

Beartracks

(13,469 posts)

5. Bad faith "rejection" of voting results to gum up the machinery of democracy sounds like fraud to me.

Reply to MagaSmash (Original post)

Wed Oct 30, 2024, 01:29 PM

51 min ago

Plus, MAGA's refusal to accept the results would not mean that there's no clear winner.

I can protest and file suit all day long that I don't "think" the Chiefs won the Super Bowl, that my bookie had them "up" by several points, that the 49ers were robbed -- but my wishful thinking and ill intent doesn't change the fact that the Chiefs clearly, fairly and legitimately won. Not to compare the serious and complicated business of politics to sports, but just picking a relatable scored contest for which the winner was clearly witnessed by everyone.

But seriously, it's like Republicans just want to play fantasy football, and the rest of America wants to get on with the serious business of democracy, self governance, solving problems, and being a respected world leader.

==================

dweller

(24,733 posts)

6. NYT just published an article

Reply to MagaSmash (Original post)

Wed Oct 30, 2024, 02:03 PM

17 min ago

On the Election Integrity group led by Cleta Mitchell , link to article
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100219618387

✌🏻

Reply to this discussion