Cable News Clips
Related: About this forumSupreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas blasts progressivism as threat to America - ABC News
Thomas said that the values enshrined in the 1776 Declaration of Independence have fallen out of favor among Americans.
====================
I have the same question regarding Clarence Thomas as Orrex has about Trump.
Ocelot II
(131,020 posts)You wouldn't have been appointed to the Supreme Court according to the values of the new United States in 1776. You wouldn't have even been allowed to learn to read. Progressivism is what got you your job.
displacedvermoter
(4,869 posts)I understand what you are saying, I guess.
displacedvermoter
(4,869 posts)Right wingers always point to the Declaration of Independence as their go to document, over the Constitution. Shrub and his crew always cited the Declaration as justification for whatever they were doing. The Constitution has that nasty Bill of Rights and they hate all but a couple of the amendments.
But yeah, back in those enlightened days of 1776, Clarence might have been lucky and worked as one of the signer's butlers, or he could have ended up a field hand. And nobody would have given two shits for his opinions, either way, on anything, never mind the law.
sop
(19,064 posts)Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(136,750 posts)Harker
(18,018 posts)"I hope so!"
SamKnause
(14,933 posts)You are a corrupt piece of trash.
There certainly is nothing supreme about you or this court.
You should be in prison not on the bench.
Blue Owl
(59,451 posts)marble falls
(72,415 posts)... one of your "friends".
jls4561
(3,245 posts)I got mine, screw the rest of you. Its his theory of jurisprudence.
Autumn
(48,992 posts)eppur_se_muova
(42,263 posts)ChicagoTeamster
(1,148 posts)as the country did. That's part of the freedom it is designed to protect.
Conservatives are the ones who the Constitution has fallen out of favor with. They want to restrict other's freedom.
Baitball Blogger
(52,606 posts)The greatest failure of our democracy was not listening to Anita Hill and taking her seriously enough to stop Clarence Thomas from soiling the reputation of the Supreme Court.
Stargazer99
(3,542 posts)Uncle Joe
(65,378 posts)Article III clearly spells out the S.C.'s job which is to interpret the latter not the former, so is Thomas abandoning his oath to the Constitution?
The Declaration of Independence wasn't a marriage, it was a divorce.
Thanks for the thread TexasTowelie
struggle4progress
(126,533 posts)FDRFTW
(99 posts)The problem
Here is he fails to define progressivism.
And one could easily plug in the word conservatism
And give the exact same meaningless speech.
Example:
Conservatism seeks to replace the basic premises of the Declaration of Independence and hence our form of government,
Thomas said in a speech at the University of Texas Austin Law School pegged to the nations upcoming milestone birthday.
A spirit of cynicism, rejection, hostility and animus toward America -- by Americans -- has taken hold, Thomas said in remarks carried live on CSPAN.