Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Liberal YouTubers
Related: About this forum🚨IDENTITY of SECRET CO-CONSPIRATORS in The Files BLOWN WIDE OPEN - Meidas Touch
'Florida Law Man' Dave Aronberg breaks down the mystery of the 10 or more redacted co-conspirators discovered in the recent Epstein files releases. - 12/27/2025.
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
🚨IDENTITY of SECRET CO-CONSPIRATORS in The Files BLOWN WIDE OPEN - Meidas Touch (Original Post)
Rhiannon12866
15 hrs ago
OP
Excellent point. Did they think of that or are they too disorganized? Or still protecting allies??
Rhiannon12866
13 hrs ago
#2
Another great point, how many of the lawyers working on the redactions are completely objective?
Rhiannon12866
13 hrs ago
#4
moniss
(8,638 posts)1. Also when you look at the civil lawsuits filed
against Maxwell over the years there are others included in those besides her and Epstein. Some of the redacted names could include some of those.
Rhiannon12866
(249,465 posts)2. Excellent point. Did they think of that or are they too disorganized? Or still protecting allies??
moniss
(8,638 posts)3. Good questions and I think it may be a combination
of the two by the description of having so many lawyers working on the redactions. Good chance for a mix of incompetence and purposeful hiding of names to cross paths. I noticed in the Maxwell suits that the names weren't well known names and I think the media is doing a bad job by seeming to be panting for big names of people rather than explaining to us who these other names in the civil suits are.
Rhiannon12866
(249,465 posts)4. Another great point, how many of the lawyers working on the redactions are completely objective?
Weren't they chosen by the DOJ? And I also agree that the media is looking for breaking news, they certainly mentioned President Clinton a lot.