The Way Forward
Related: About this forumSome on DU have reservations about direct action and the subsequent potential for
enacting martial law. What would be the effect of this on the economy? I believe it would tank the economy and it would stay tanked until martial law was ended. Let tsf bear the weight of having done this thing.
I believe there-in is an answer. As we know the 1A is protective of right to assembly and redress of grievances.
It's a bluff. IMO
I am not an economist.
What say you?
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/amendment-1/
https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/martial-law-times-civil-disorder
JustAnotherGen
(34,239 posts)Would be liberals in an open carry state.
I'm serious.
The reaction to that would determine any future thoughts on this.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(27,070 posts)martial law was enacted here.
Mike 03
(18,005 posts)concern about consequences generally.
I don't think Trump is worried about near-term damage to the economy because his own economic policies seem almost designed to promote inflation, uncertainty and unemployment. (So far, with respect to tariffs, there's been more talk than action--which is good).
The only thing I've said about the dangers of direct action is that each person should perform a risk analysis of some kind based on their own circumstances and inclinations, because it appears the consequences of direct action could be more serious than they were during the first term, when resistance was fun and the risks were low.
There are any number of excuses Trump could conceivably use to declare martial law--and I think there are scenarios more easily available to him than protests, although to reiterate, I am glad you posted about this and it has to be considered.
Prairie_Seagull
(3,940 posts)Good point that an individual needs to do their own risk assessment. When one perceives their country at risk I believe more risk would be accepted. My own is not listed.
Will the spring be to late?
He is legislating via EO! How far is considered acceptable?