Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Prairie_Seagull

(3,940 posts)
Tue Feb 4, 2025, 12:23 PM Yesterday

Some on DU have reservations about direct action and the subsequent potential for

enacting martial law. What would be the effect of this on the economy? I believe it would tank the economy and it would stay tanked until martial law was ended. Let tsf bear the weight of having done this thing.

I believe there-in is an answer. As we know the 1A is protective of right to assembly and redress of grievances.

It's a bluff. IMO

I am not an economist.

What say you?

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/amendment-1/

https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/martial-law-times-civil-disorder

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Some on DU have reservations about direct action and the subsequent potential for (Original Post) Prairie_Seagull Yesterday OP
I think the best test JustAnotherGen Yesterday #1
Remind me again of the earlier times PoindexterOglethorpe Yesterday #2
I think it is worth considering this. I think there's a more general Mike 03 Yesterday #3
Point taken. Prairie_Seagull Yesterday #4

JustAnotherGen

(34,239 posts)
1. I think the best test
Tue Feb 4, 2025, 12:26 PM
Yesterday

Would be liberals in an open carry state.

I'm serious.

The reaction to that would determine any future thoughts on this.

Mike 03

(18,005 posts)
3. I think it is worth considering this. I think there's a more general
Tue Feb 4, 2025, 02:01 PM
Yesterday

concern about consequences generally.

I don't think Trump is worried about near-term damage to the economy because his own economic policies seem almost designed to promote inflation, uncertainty and unemployment. (So far, with respect to tariffs, there's been more talk than action--which is good).

The only thing I've said about the dangers of direct action is that each person should perform a risk analysis of some kind based on their own circumstances and inclinations, because it appears the consequences of direct action could be more serious than they were during the first term, when resistance was fun and the risks were low.

There are any number of excuses Trump could conceivably use to declare martial law--and I think there are scenarios more easily available to him than protests, although to reiterate, I am glad you posted about this and it has to be considered.

Prairie_Seagull

(3,940 posts)
4. Point taken.
Tue Feb 4, 2025, 05:36 PM
Yesterday

Good point that an individual needs to do their own risk assessment. When one perceives their country at risk I believe more risk would be accepted. My own is not listed.

Will the spring be to late?

He is legislating via EO! How far is considered acceptable?

Latest Discussions»The Way Forward»Some on DU have reservati...