Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 360 Democratic delegates say they'll oppose party platform that does not include 'Medicare for All' [View all]ehrnst
(32,640 posts)43. Less than 5% of the total delegates. They clearly know that this is not enough to make it happen.
So, one has to wonder the actual goal behind it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
114 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

360 Democratic delegates say they'll oppose party platform that does not include 'Medicare for All' [View all]
babylonsister
Jul 2020
OP
That's too bad, because there are other ways to get to UHC, as the majority of the rest
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#2
If you ask them just how long it took for Canada to implement their health care system
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#81
The campaigns to get rid of trump and elect Biden - do not need this trumpian diversion demand
empedocles
Jul 2020
#3
At this point in time with so many losing their healthcare provided through their jobs this is
Autumn
Jul 2020
#4
I really don't care to go where you are trying to get me to. I applaud them for pushing for it.
Autumn
Jul 2020
#13
No, just replying to your post. I emptied my ignore list to read a nasty ass comment about AOC
Autumn
Jul 2020
#18
Indeed. We complain about the tyranny of the Senate because of the outsized GOP representation
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#31
They are desperate for click income, so their headlines are getting more overwrought. (nt)
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#41
No it's not. It's not the time nor the place. WIN FIRST!!! Right now they (we)....
George II
Jul 2020
#42
I disagree completely. People are hurting, there is a pandemic and a severe healthcare crises.
Autumn
Jul 2020
#45
When someone actually comes up with a plan and we have a majority in the Senate......
George II
Jul 2020
#47
I don't consider it to be divisiveness. This is Democrats letting people know that they want to get
Autumn
Jul 2020
#51
Obviously most Democrats do consider it divisive, especially since there is no comprehensive plan...
George II
Jul 2020
#54
Some of us don't consider attempting to do things that many people need and want to be divisive.
Autumn
Jul 2020
#56
When it gets in the way of actually accomplishing something that people do need, then yes,
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#65
M4A is still not what the majority of Dems want, and it's not the only option...
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#63
Yes - UHC is inclusive, and M4A hasn't gotten off the ground in Congress since at least 1971.
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#7
Actually Medicare for All has been introduced at least in the House since the mid-1940s.
George II
Jul 2020
#48
Thank you for the reminder - Truman proposed it. That was our window for single payer.
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#49
President Biden made his opposition to Medicare for All clear...but that was before COVID.
BComplex
Jul 2020
#15
I'm not opining about smart or non-smart; I'm saying Biden reserves the right to change his mind
BComplex
Jul 2020
#53
If he changes his mind on anything else, there are those on the far left who will
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#58
What evidence to you have that many far left Sanders supporters are "russian plants" and not
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#66
I hope that there is a tribute to him this year, and that those who showed such disrepect
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#109
I was a delegate to the 2016 convention and we were prepared for up to 4 floor votes
Gothmog
Jul 2020
#20
I can understand health concerns, but when Vermont actually tried to pass single payer, Sanders did
JI7
Jul 2020
#34
One would think that the state who sent Sanders to the Senate would have the will to implement it.
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#39
Who is in control of the Senate? Has anyone passed anything in the Senate? Other than a couple
Autumn
Jul 2020
#29
The ACA and CHIPR passed in months. Before that Ted Kennedy and HRC got CHIP through in months.
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#40
That was then. Since Trump has been in office what has Mitch done? Nothing. The House
Autumn
Jul 2020
#44
I told you I emptied my ignore list to read a nasty comment about AOC . You don't like my
Autumn
Jul 2020
#55
You keep responding, even if it's just to frantically try to change the topic from one that's
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#57
I'm polite, when someone says something to me I respond. That's what people do on a discussion
Autumn
Jul 2020
#60
There is a difference between responding and attempting to be the last one to post.
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#67
There is a difference between responding and attempting to be the last one to post.
Autumn
Jul 2020
#82
Not hard at all, it was OT for the subject discussion . I know why he voted no vote on CHIP and
Autumn
Jul 2020
#84
So you weren't really looking for a response. No need to get personal, I'm sure there are
Autumn
Jul 2020
#86
Yes I was rather clear. There have been "no" votes on Democratic issues by Democrats
Autumn
Jul 2020
#90
You brought up his vote "no" vote on CHIPS, I gave you MY opinion on that one single vote.
Autumn
Jul 2020
#99
You still engage, while avoiding the hard truths and attempting to change the topic.
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#108
I see only one goal in mind. Get rump/gop out of the WH and Senate. Period. All other good ...
SWBTATTReg
Jul 2020
#30
Less than 5% of the total delegates. They clearly know that this is not enough to make it happen.
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#43
So what happens if the Biden team does not give in to the demands from this group??
honest.abe
Jul 2020
#69
Thankfully, this year it's online, so we won't be an opportunity for booing civil rights
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#71
I imagine that the meeting leader has the ability to determine who has the floor
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#76
I have seen this...here and on twitter. They don't want Trump but they don't want a Biden
Demsrule86
Jul 2020
#93
Echos of Jill Stein? Is this the start of Susan Sarandon's "revolution"? nt
JustABozoOnThisBus
Jul 2020
#79
Right now we're working on saving people's souls. We'll get around to their health later.
jalan48
Jul 2020
#95