Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 360 Democratic delegates say they'll oppose party platform that does not include 'Medicare for All' [View all]babylonsister
(171,887 posts)68. Did you read it?
the pledge comes as Sanders supporters have largely united behind Biden
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
114 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

360 Democratic delegates say they'll oppose party platform that does not include 'Medicare for All' [View all]
babylonsister
Jul 2020
OP
That's too bad, because there are other ways to get to UHC, as the majority of the rest
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#2
If you ask them just how long it took for Canada to implement their health care system
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#81
The campaigns to get rid of trump and elect Biden - do not need this trumpian diversion demand
empedocles
Jul 2020
#3
At this point in time with so many losing their healthcare provided through their jobs this is
Autumn
Jul 2020
#4
I really don't care to go where you are trying to get me to. I applaud them for pushing for it.
Autumn
Jul 2020
#13
No, just replying to your post. I emptied my ignore list to read a nasty ass comment about AOC
Autumn
Jul 2020
#18
Indeed. We complain about the tyranny of the Senate because of the outsized GOP representation
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#31
They are desperate for click income, so their headlines are getting more overwrought. (nt)
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#41
No it's not. It's not the time nor the place. WIN FIRST!!! Right now they (we)....
George II
Jul 2020
#42
I disagree completely. People are hurting, there is a pandemic and a severe healthcare crises.
Autumn
Jul 2020
#45
When someone actually comes up with a plan and we have a majority in the Senate......
George II
Jul 2020
#47
I don't consider it to be divisiveness. This is Democrats letting people know that they want to get
Autumn
Jul 2020
#51
Obviously most Democrats do consider it divisive, especially since there is no comprehensive plan...
George II
Jul 2020
#54
Some of us don't consider attempting to do things that many people need and want to be divisive.
Autumn
Jul 2020
#56
When it gets in the way of actually accomplishing something that people do need, then yes,
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#65
M4A is still not what the majority of Dems want, and it's not the only option...
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#63
Yes - UHC is inclusive, and M4A hasn't gotten off the ground in Congress since at least 1971.
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#7
Actually Medicare for All has been introduced at least in the House since the mid-1940s.
George II
Jul 2020
#48
Thank you for the reminder - Truman proposed it. That was our window for single payer.
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#49
President Biden made his opposition to Medicare for All clear...but that was before COVID.
BComplex
Jul 2020
#15
I'm not opining about smart or non-smart; I'm saying Biden reserves the right to change his mind
BComplex
Jul 2020
#53
If he changes his mind on anything else, there are those on the far left who will
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#58
What evidence to you have that many far left Sanders supporters are "russian plants" and not
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#66
I hope that there is a tribute to him this year, and that those who showed such disrepect
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#109
I was a delegate to the 2016 convention and we were prepared for up to 4 floor votes
Gothmog
Jul 2020
#20
I can understand health concerns, but when Vermont actually tried to pass single payer, Sanders did
JI7
Jul 2020
#34
One would think that the state who sent Sanders to the Senate would have the will to implement it.
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#39
Who is in control of the Senate? Has anyone passed anything in the Senate? Other than a couple
Autumn
Jul 2020
#29
The ACA and CHIPR passed in months. Before that Ted Kennedy and HRC got CHIP through in months.
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#40
That was then. Since Trump has been in office what has Mitch done? Nothing. The House
Autumn
Jul 2020
#44
I told you I emptied my ignore list to read a nasty comment about AOC . You don't like my
Autumn
Jul 2020
#55
You keep responding, even if it's just to frantically try to change the topic from one that's
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#57
I'm polite, when someone says something to me I respond. That's what people do on a discussion
Autumn
Jul 2020
#60
There is a difference between responding and attempting to be the last one to post.
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#67
There is a difference between responding and attempting to be the last one to post.
Autumn
Jul 2020
#82
Not hard at all, it was OT for the subject discussion . I know why he voted no vote on CHIP and
Autumn
Jul 2020
#84
So you weren't really looking for a response. No need to get personal, I'm sure there are
Autumn
Jul 2020
#86
Yes I was rather clear. There have been "no" votes on Democratic issues by Democrats
Autumn
Jul 2020
#90
You brought up his vote "no" vote on CHIPS, I gave you MY opinion on that one single vote.
Autumn
Jul 2020
#99
You still engage, while avoiding the hard truths and attempting to change the topic.
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#108
I see only one goal in mind. Get rump/gop out of the WH and Senate. Period. All other good ...
SWBTATTReg
Jul 2020
#30
Less than 5% of the total delegates. They clearly know that this is not enough to make it happen.
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#43
So what happens if the Biden team does not give in to the demands from this group??
honest.abe
Jul 2020
#69
Thankfully, this year it's online, so we won't be an opportunity for booing civil rights
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#71
I imagine that the meeting leader has the ability to determine who has the floor
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#76
I have seen this...here and on twitter. They don't want Trump but they don't want a Biden
Demsrule86
Jul 2020
#93
Echos of Jill Stein? Is this the start of Susan Sarandon's "revolution"? nt
JustABozoOnThisBus
Jul 2020
#79
Right now we're working on saving people's souls. We'll get around to their health later.
jalan48
Jul 2020
#95