General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I've had enough armchair prosecutors criticizing the House Managers for not calling witnesses. [View all]Bobstandard
(1,740 posts)Todays impeachment trials are, as much as anything, public spectacles. One competes for hearts and minds, emphasis on the former. The rules of procedure dont apply outside the courtroom, and the spectacle in the chambers was anything but a courtroom. Instead it was a media space with two sides battling for the sympathies of the viewers-and there werent that many of them. In a sense it was a fight for the news bites, the news cycle on various outlets. The story to be told in two years, in four years.
On the one side, the inevitable conclusion of Republicans letting him off was a win for Trump. One way to make the proceedings a loss for Trump was to drag them out. To highlight his every violence against the constitution, and to highlight his incredible, mean incompetence. A longer trial with witnesses possibly emerging from the woodwork would have done that
And lets not forget that Democrats had control of the process. They could have ended it whenever they chose. If proceedings threatened to retard Bidens agenda, they could have bailed. Until then theyd have laid bare Trumps malfeasance.
Chance abrogated. Sigh.
Still, there is the lesson of Benghazi. Lets keep those Trump hearings coming.