Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: On White Evangelical Protestants [View all]dalton99a
(86,137 posts)16. +1. Excellent book
...
My brothers were members of a very peculiar group of believers, not representative of the majority of Christians but of an avant-garde of the social movement I call American fundamentalism, a movement that recasts theology in the language of empire. Avant-garde is a term usually reserved for innovators, artists who live strange and dangerous lives and translate their strange and dangerous thoughts into pictures or poetry or fantastical buildings. The term has a political ancestry as well: Lenin used it to describe the elite cadres he believed could spark a revolution. It is in this sense that the men to whom my brothers apprenticed themselves, a seventy-year-old self-described invisible network of followers of Christ in government, business, and the military, use the term avant-garde. They call themselves the Family, or The Fellowship, and they consider themselves a core of men responsible for changing the world. Hitler, Lenin, and many others understood the power of a small core of people, instructs a document given to an inner circle, explaining the scope, if not the ideological particulars, of the ambition members of this avant-garde are to cultivate.1 Or, as a former Ivanwald brother whod used his Ivanwald connections to find a foothold in the insurance industry told my brothers and me during a seminar on biblical capitalism, Look at it like this: take a bunch of sticks, light each one of em on fire. Separate, they go out. Put em together, though, and light the bundle. Now youre ready to burn.
Hitler, to the Family, is no more real than Attila the Hun as drafted by business gurus who promise unstoppable leadership techniques drawn from historys killers; or for that matter Christ, himself, as rendered in a business best seller called Jesus, CEO. The Familys avant-garde is not composed of neo-Nazis, or crypto-Nazis, or fascists by any traditional definition; they are fundamentalists, and in this still-secular age, fundamentalism is a religion of both affluence and revolution.
...
The more I learned about the Family, the more difficulty I had in classifying its theology. It is Protestant, to be sure, though there are Catholic members. Its leadership regards with disdain not only the mainline denominations, but also evangelicals they consider lukewarm. And yet they distance themselves from the bullying of televangelists and moral scolds as well, in part because of theological differences (Jesus, they believe, instructs them to cultivate the powerful regardless of their doctrinal purity) and in part based on style (the Family believes in a subtler evangelism). They take the same approach to religion that Ronald Reagan took to economics, says a Senate staffer named Neil MacBride, a political liberal with conservative evangelical convictions that put him at odds with the Familys unorthodox fundamentalism. Reach the elite, and the blessings will trickle down to the underlings.
...
But at Ivanwald, or in a prayer cell at the Cedars, or in conversations with world leaders, the Familys beliefs appear closer to a more marginal set of theologies sometimes gathered under the umbrella term of dominionism, characterized for me by William Martin, a religious historian at Rice University and Billy Grahams official biographer, as the intellectual heart of the Christian Right. Dominionist theologies hold the Bible to be a guide to every decision, high and low, from whom God wants you to marry to whether God thinks you should buy a new lawn mower. Unlike neo-evangelicals, who concern themselves chiefly with getting good with Jesus, dominionists want to reconstruct early Christian society, which they believe was ruled by God alone. They view themselves as the new chosen and claim a Christian doctrine of covenantalism, meaning covenants not only between God and humanity but at every level of society, replacing the rule of law and its secular contracts. Since these covenants are signed, as it were, in the Blood of the Lamb, they are written in ink invisible to nonbelievers.
...
My brothers were members of a very peculiar group of believers, not representative of the majority of Christians but of an avant-garde of the social movement I call American fundamentalism, a movement that recasts theology in the language of empire. Avant-garde is a term usually reserved for innovators, artists who live strange and dangerous lives and translate their strange and dangerous thoughts into pictures or poetry or fantastical buildings. The term has a political ancestry as well: Lenin used it to describe the elite cadres he believed could spark a revolution. It is in this sense that the men to whom my brothers apprenticed themselves, a seventy-year-old self-described invisible network of followers of Christ in government, business, and the military, use the term avant-garde. They call themselves the Family, or The Fellowship, and they consider themselves a core of men responsible for changing the world. Hitler, Lenin, and many others understood the power of a small core of people, instructs a document given to an inner circle, explaining the scope, if not the ideological particulars, of the ambition members of this avant-garde are to cultivate.1 Or, as a former Ivanwald brother whod used his Ivanwald connections to find a foothold in the insurance industry told my brothers and me during a seminar on biblical capitalism, Look at it like this: take a bunch of sticks, light each one of em on fire. Separate, they go out. Put em together, though, and light the bundle. Now youre ready to burn.
Hitler, to the Family, is no more real than Attila the Hun as drafted by business gurus who promise unstoppable leadership techniques drawn from historys killers; or for that matter Christ, himself, as rendered in a business best seller called Jesus, CEO. The Familys avant-garde is not composed of neo-Nazis, or crypto-Nazis, or fascists by any traditional definition; they are fundamentalists, and in this still-secular age, fundamentalism is a religion of both affluence and revolution.
...
The more I learned about the Family, the more difficulty I had in classifying its theology. It is Protestant, to be sure, though there are Catholic members. Its leadership regards with disdain not only the mainline denominations, but also evangelicals they consider lukewarm. And yet they distance themselves from the bullying of televangelists and moral scolds as well, in part because of theological differences (Jesus, they believe, instructs them to cultivate the powerful regardless of their doctrinal purity) and in part based on style (the Family believes in a subtler evangelism). They take the same approach to religion that Ronald Reagan took to economics, says a Senate staffer named Neil MacBride, a political liberal with conservative evangelical convictions that put him at odds with the Familys unorthodox fundamentalism. Reach the elite, and the blessings will trickle down to the underlings.
...
But at Ivanwald, or in a prayer cell at the Cedars, or in conversations with world leaders, the Familys beliefs appear closer to a more marginal set of theologies sometimes gathered under the umbrella term of dominionism, characterized for me by William Martin, a religious historian at Rice University and Billy Grahams official biographer, as the intellectual heart of the Christian Right. Dominionist theologies hold the Bible to be a guide to every decision, high and low, from whom God wants you to marry to whether God thinks you should buy a new lawn mower. Unlike neo-evangelicals, who concern themselves chiefly with getting good with Jesus, dominionists want to reconstruct early Christian society, which they believe was ruled by God alone. They view themselves as the new chosen and claim a Christian doctrine of covenantalism, meaning covenants not only between God and humanity but at every level of society, replacing the rule of law and its secular contracts. Since these covenants are signed, as it were, in the Blood of the Lamb, they are written in ink invisible to nonbelievers.
...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Good editorial, and one of those rare times when reading the comments pays off.
crickets
Jul 2021
#11
Exactly, the christofascists have been working toward a christian theocracy since Reagan.
Thomas Hurt
Jul 2021
#13
+1000000, required reading for anyone wondering what is really going on today.
cayugafalls
Jul 2021
#23
What will they say/do when it is not their version of Christianity in charge?
keithbvadu2
Jul 2021
#20
A departure from the history of the evangelical denominations to whom we owe the 1st Amendment.
TygrBright
Jul 2021
#32
It's entirely possible. On the other hand, given our incredibly strong cultural support...
TygrBright
Jul 2021
#36
The difference is that the basic doctrines of those colonial "Evangelicals" has changed
lees1975
Jul 2021
#46