General Discussion

Lets go through it one more time just so you can once again ignore it.

"DOJ dropped the ball by allowing a pro-Trump fake company have access to ballots, voter information, election material and equipment, all in violation of state and federal laws. Those items should have remained in the possession of election officials."

Once AZ passed legislation to allow the ninjas to do an audit, they were not in violation of any state or federal laws. Audits are allowed even if repugs choose to hire an obviously partisan company to do it. The only law they intended to break was to use the materials to go door to door and question voters... Garland told them he would prosecute if they tried and they immediately put a halt to any such action.

"Why is the select committee subpoenaing fake electors if DOJ is acting on the Michigan AG's referral? Why would the select committee get involved in an ongoing investigation?"

How does the Jan 6th committee bringing in the fake electors to talk to have anything to do with the DOJ investigation? False premise that looks to me like an insinuation that there is no DOJ investigation when we know there is one. If I'm wrong, explain the issue here further please.

"It is day 68 since the Mark Meadows criminal referral, day 40 since the Michigan AG's referral."

Again, it is explained in easy to understand language here:

https://www.emptywheel.net/2022/02/07/why-to-delay-a-mark-meadows-indictment-bannon-is-using-his-contempt-prosecution-to-monitor-the-ongoing-january-6-investigation/

So... There it is. Yet again disputed for you to ignore.