Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Ancient 'Jesus midwife' tomb to be excavated by archaeologists Associated Press [View all]Sympthsical
(10,937 posts)11. It is accepted by historians that Jesus existed
I'm not religious, but I kind of moved past this stuff back in college. There is plenty of evidence he existed, and it isn't seriously disputed by historians.
As with any major topic, there are plenty of fringe theories about this stuff, but the historical record is pretty clear that he existed and had some kind of religious following.
Now, which stories in the Bible may or may not be true is a completely different kettle of fish.
But Jesus the person was an actual thing.
I tried to find a recentish short primer that DU would accept. There's this for the sake of simplicity.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/apr/14/what-is-the-historical-evidence-that-jesus-christ-lived-and-died
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Ancient 'Jesus midwife' tomb to be excavated by archaeologists Associated Press [View all]
magicarpet
Dec 2022
OP
It was a first birth, husband could have been rattled and rushed to seek help.
Irish_Dem
Dec 2022
#2
The story of a midwife is in an apocryphal gospel. And IIRC, the midwife's name isn't Salome;
WhiskeyGrinder
Dec 2022
#3
There's literally no reliable evidence that the Bible's Jesus of Nazareth was anything but
Hugh_Lebowski
Dec 2022
#4
Pretty sure that if one cannot prove there was a Jesus, it logically follows one also
Hugh_Lebowski
Dec 2022
#14
And yet, the Epistles of St Paul, the 'earliest' time he's mentioned anywhere
Hugh_Lebowski
Dec 2022
#16
A trenchant analysis, hell it even sounds like something I'd write nearly verbatim, thanks! (nt)
Hugh_Lebowski
Dec 2022
#24
The most important question when considering whether or not some man-god got sent down
Goodheart
Dec 2022
#34