Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
How long will you give Garland the benefit of the doubt? [View all]
There's a clear difference between some posters already frustrated with the fact there hasn't been an indictment of Trump, while some say it's important we give him the benefit of the doubt--that an indictment will happen in time. My question is how long will you maintain that position?
Pick the longest length of time you are willing to continue to support Garland if an indictment has not yet been issued.
| 40 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
| I'm already frustrated with the lack of an indictment | |
30 (75%) |
|
| In 3 months, I'll still be giving Garland the benefit of the doubt | |
0 (0%) |
|
| In 6 months, I'll still be giving Garland the benefit of the doubt | |
0 (0%) |
|
| In 12 months, I'll still be be giving Garland the benefit of the doubt | |
0 (0%) |
|
| In 18 months, I'll still be giving Garland the benefit of the doubt | |
0 (0%) |
|
| In 2 years, I'll still trust that Garland will indict Trump | |
0 (0%) |
|
| However long it takes | |
10 (25%) |
|
| I'll support Garland even if he never indicts Trump | |
0 (0%) |
|
| Other, explain below | |
0 (0%) |
|
| 0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
| Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
|
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read