Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(59,886 posts)
10. We don't have to accept that future. Just as we don't accept
Fri Feb 10, 2023, 11:10 AM
Feb 2023

people driving cars as fast as they can go, anywhere they feel like speeding.

You're describing AI exploiting what's been created by humans, without giving them credit or compensation. That needs to be stopped, and there are already lawsuits trying to do that.

And while at this point there might be some people in publishing or the film and TV industry thinking it'll be great not to have to pay and deal with real writers, AI also threatens them because it could also lead to publishers, booksellers, filmmakers and theaters being cut out as well. AI is getting closer and closer to being able to generate completely convincing actors as well as settings. It can already direct in terms of being able to suggest camera shots for scripts it generates. So if we accept heading in that direction, people will simply be able to tell AI to generate any books or films they want, with whatever content they want.

I don't want AI-generated work that rips off and exploits real art, puts real artists out of work, and discourages aspiring artists from using their own creativity.

That's a nightmare future.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This is like saying "Would you use google to do research on a topic?" lapfog_1 Feb 2023 #1
No. Not the same thing at all. Writing, like speech, is communication. highplainsdem Feb 2023 #2
Google is an Encyclopedia. Yavin4 Feb 2023 #24
Ai is only going to get better and I assume in the future Johonny Feb 2023 #3
How would you feel about AI writing novels if you'd ever been paid well for your highplainsdem Feb 2023 #5
I mean, you can see the future Johonny Feb 2023 #6
We don't have to accept that future. Just as we don't accept highplainsdem Feb 2023 #10
How do you know you're not arguing with an AI bot on the internet right now Johonny Feb 2023 #17
Most people argue like bots already. fescuerescue Feb 2023 #19
No. I am not fine with AI generated writings, however Freethinker65 Feb 2023 #4
In all of those, you'll be losing the personality of the writer and highplainsdem Feb 2023 #7
I think using AI as an editor for non-professionals is probably ok with limitations. Freethinker65 Feb 2023 #27
Hallie Jackson read a news article about AI, written by AI, on her show this week. CrispyQ Feb 2023 #8
The thing is, they won't tell people it was AI-generated. Not if they're highplainsdem Feb 2023 #15
Amazon reviews already are falsified, think what this means for that! Pobeka Feb 2023 #9
Crap. Hadn't even thought about that. And there are probably already highplainsdem Feb 2023 #23
I've already started using it for this purpose fescuerescue Feb 2023 #11
If writing agendas, or anything else, based on your boss's suggestions is highplainsdem Feb 2023 #12
That part of the job yes fescuerescue Feb 2023 #14
I wish I'd had something like this in my previous job NotASurfer Feb 2023 #26
would you eliminate spell check and cut and paste as well? dembotoz Feb 2023 #13
You're talking about tools to put words on paper, or publish them or transmit highplainsdem Feb 2023 #18
No doubt it would improve my writing, but... old as dirt Feb 2023 #16
I don't need anyone or anything to write for me. Solly Mack Feb 2023 #20
Hey, even the best writers in the world can sometimes be helped highplainsdem Feb 2023 #21
Absolutely. Solly Mack Feb 2023 #25
I wonder how this is going to affect keystroke logging technology. nt crickets Feb 2023 #22
I wouldn't mind it depending on circumstance Sympthsical Feb 2023 #28
Writing takes time. I like saving it. So, perhaps for a first pass that I later edit. tinrobot Feb 2023 #29
Would it include derogatory language? LiberalFighter Feb 2023 #30
I wouldn't want to deal with someone who was passing the AI work as their own ripcord Feb 2023 #31
The Future of AI, by ChatGPT old as dirt Feb 2023 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Would you use AI to write...»Reply #10