Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

ProfessorGAC

(71,444 posts)

14. A Long Post...

Reply to onenote (Reply #13)

Sun Mar 10, 2024, 03:18 PM

Mar 2024

...that says nothing.
Exxon did NOT get away with paying such a small feaction
In addition, my point was very clear.
You claimed they paid only $90 million. I showed you that's wrong.
All the rest of your screed is a smokescreen to cover your error. Your using details to avoid admitting your first post was grossly misleading.
Now that I know this is not an honest conversation, I'm done.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Now who will pay the Trump Organization's 350 million $ fine from NY State? [View all] Botany Mar 2024 OP

Several possibilities: Girard442 Mar 2024 #1

Add Xi Jinping to this list. Irish_Dem Mar 2024 #4

The global autocrats and oligarchs are probably taking up a collection. Irish_Dem Mar 2024 #2

The bottom line is that "The Steele Dossier*" was 100% true because the important part of it was Botany Mar 2024 #7

Exactly. The money is there for Trump and has been for a long time. Irish_Dem Mar 2024 #9

Well it is not like Trump had our military aircraft Botany Mar 2024 #15

Look at all the smart people voting and helping Trump. Irish_Dem Mar 2024 #17

Maybe State Farm or Allstate will step up to the plate dalton99a Mar 2024 #3

Jake from State Farm says... calguy Mar 2024 #6

A group of banks got together to provide Exxon with a surety for its $5 billion judgment in the Exxon Valdez case onenote Mar 2024 #5

Not Quite ProfessorGAC Mar 2024 #10

Not sure what point you're making but you're mistaken. onenote Mar 2024 #13

A Long Post... ProfessorGAC Mar 2024 #14

Not sure why you're being obtuse. How much do you think Exxon paid for the $5 billion bond? Because that's the issue. onenote Mar 2024 #16

Maybe Chubb has that covered, too? WarGamer Mar 2024 #8

The Same Person Who Wkll Pay The $91 Million. ProfessorGAC Mar 2024 #11

The question is, does Chubb really expect to get their money back? Silent3 Mar 2024 #18

Saudis republianmushroom Mar 2024 #12