Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

aggiesal

(10,044 posts)
7. Here is Dan Rather's article ...
Tue Jul 9, 2024, 09:57 AM
Jul 2024
A Dangerous Double Standard
All our energies must go to defeating Trump
Dan Rather and Team Steady

Jul 08, 2024


What a weekend. You know I have seen some things in my seven decades covering American politics. I have never seen anything quite like the wrangling, hand-wringing, and behind-the-scenes gamesmanship currently swirling around President Biden. These are compounded by the one-sided media coverage against Biden. And it isn’t over yet.

One thing is for certain: If Biden stays in the race, every step, every word, every gesture will be parsed, dissected, and magnified. This is the reality, at least for the Democrats. Trump? Not so much. Or really, very little.

Case in point: On Friday, Biden sat down with ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos. In the transcript of the interview released by ABC, Biden said, “I’ll feel as long as I gave it my all and I did the goodest job as I know I can do, that’s what this is about.” Several news organizations and the White House took issue with the word “goodest.” According to The New York Times, the ABC standards team listened again to the audio and changed “goodest” to “good as.” According to the Times, “Mr. Biden’s actual words at that point in the interview were difficult to make out and open to interpretation.”

So here we are — one slightly hard to discern word in an otherwise coherent interview. And then there is the other guy. The one who can’t seem to string together a single coherent sentence — a fact news organizations don’t even bother mentioning any more. Try making sense of this gobbledegook from Trump’s remarks at a recent rally in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania:

“Our nation was saved by the immortal heroes at Gettysburg. Gettysburg, what an unbelievable battle that was. The battle of Gettysburg, what an unbelievable. I mean it was so, was so much, and so interesting, and so vicious and horrible, and so beautiful in so many different ways — it represented such a big portion of the success of this country. Gettysburg, wow! I go to Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, to look and to watch. And uh the statement of Robert E. Lee, who’s no longer in favor — did you ever notice that? He’s no longer in favor. ‘Never fight uphill, me boys, never fight uphill.’ They were fighting uphill, he said. Wow, that was a big mistake, he lost his great general and uh they were fighting uphill. ‘Never fight uphill, me boys,’ but it was too late.”

What?? You may not have heard about this because it was “lightly” reported, i.e. not a word from The Washington Post, The New York Times, CNN, or the Associated Press. Jon Stewart did mention it on “The Daily Show,” saying it was “plagiarized, almost directly, from my seventh-grade book report, ‘Gettysburg, Wow.’”

Why are the rules so different for these two men? Both should be held accountable for their deeds and words. But they aren’t. Trump gets pass after pass.

The Republicans have hitched their wagon to a cult leader. They are willing to do just about anything to win back the White House: lie; obliterate the rules; blindly back a convicted felon, a cheater, a sexual assaulter, a Project 2025 promoter, a dictator on day one, and an insurrectionist. Maybe they should change their MAGA caps to say “The ends justify the means.”

The Democrats have, to this point, backed the president, a decent man who has devoted his life to the service of the country. Now that the proverbial chips are somewhere near rock-bottom, the party doesn’t know what to do. Remain loyal to a man who has objectively done a very good job after the debacle that was the Trump administration, and risk Trump 2.0? Or nudge Biden out in favor of Vice President Kamala Harris or any number of untested contenders? The finger-pointing and “blames-manship” will be epic if Trump wins. Where is this headed? As my father said, “he who lives by the crystal ball learns to eat a lot of broken glass.”

But for those of us who believe in the great American Experiment — a constitutional republic based on the principles of freedom and democracy — this is what it looks like, folks. It’s raucous, sometimes ugly, painful, and chock full of anxiety. But one thing we can do and are doing is speak freely. That could all change. Imagine a world where the Trump police track down naysayers and truth tellers. He has vowed retribution, even military tribunals for his political enemies. And then he would not be subject to prosecution. In our system of government, we have the right to question our leaders. If Trump wins, that could quickly disappear.

In the confusion, uncertainty, and anxiety of the moment, and amidst all the disappointing media coverage, it is time to remind ourselves once again what is at stake in this election.

Please know that we feel your anxiety and we welcome your insights, your frustration, your worries in the comments on this forum. It’s an open exchange. All I ask is that you remain respectful to your fellow Steady readers. Please, no name-calling or foul language. I enjoy reading your comments. We desperately need this passion come November. Our democracy depends on it.

Recommendations

11 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The logic to this theory is that expectations are low for Trump so people don't even bother. Renew Deal Jul 2024 #1
It has gotten to be so much about optics and not content.. Peacetrain Jul 2024 #2
Some one turned me on to something DENVERPOPS Jul 2024 #10
Wii do! I have seen the term used in here in other ops but have not looked it up yet Peacetrain Jul 2024 #11
Gish gallop is talked about frequently here. ananda Jul 2024 #12
Gish gallop LiberalArkie Jul 2024 #13
Gish gallopers used to be called bullshit artists. sop Jul 2024 #17
I think the only way to deal with it is not to engage with it in the first place. Trueblue Texan Jul 2024 #16
As long as the debate judges know what is going on fine, but the party throwing out the garbage may make points LiberalArkie Jul 2024 #19
There have been some DU posts about the gish gallop. wnylib Jul 2024 #23
I don't see Biden fighting "Gish Gallop" with "Gish Gallop" Is there another way to fight against it in a debate? SupportSanity Jul 2024 #27
Yes, that may be true PatSeg Jul 2024 #15
K&R spanone Jul 2024 #3
Dan Rather bdamomma Jul 2024 #4
"Imperfections", you are too kind. Magoo48 Jul 2024 #18
Koch, Sinclair, Mercer, and Murdoch are especially interested in destroying government. Hermit-The-Prog Jul 2024 #25
Almost 2 weeks in and the word "disastrous" is used in every story. Boomerproud Jul 2024 #5
Let's not kid ourselves. They are not going to let this go. hadEnuf Jul 2024 #6
This!!! Seems every news source latched onto this description within 48 hrs of the event. n/t thenelm1 Jul 2024 #8
Here is Dan Rather's article ... aggiesal Jul 2024 #7
God bless Dan Rather. calimary Jul 2024 #9
Gish gallop 90-percent Jul 2024 #14
He's right. GoodRaisin Jul 2024 #20
Well, we here on DU are analyzing Trump's every move SpankMe Jul 2024 #21
Biden is not physically "feeble". llmart Jul 2024 #22
Trump is obese JustAnotherGen Jul 2024 #24
Aaand A DIAPER! bobalew Jul 2024 #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Thank you Dan Rather!!!! ...»Reply #7