Project 2025 for those looking for more of it's horrors in one place [View all]
I ran across a long but excellent thread on X by Emily Galvin-Almanza (a lawyer active in the public defender space) that is one of the better explanations of much of the ramifications of various Project 2025 proposals. Not exhaustive, but I learned new things of interest. It's not published anywhere else but I thought it merited wider circulation, so I put it in a single document. I wanted to share it here, but not without permission. I now have that. "sure go for it!" she said.
You may have heard the term Project 2025 floating around, and you may even have cracked open the 900+ page document yourself, only to see a lot of kind of bland, policy-wonk text. So let me crack through the policy-speak and tell you WTF is in this document.
This is, um, a long thread. But if you want a lot of info about Project 2025, all in one place, you've come to the right place.
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24088042-project-2025s-mandate-for-leadership-the-conservative-promise
This document is what Trump and his team will do if elected. Its their document, their plan, their platform. So like
its not *me* saying what theyll do, this is *them* saying so.
https://www.heritage.org/impact/trump-administration-embraces-heritage-foundation-policy-recommendations
Shall we dig in? Ill organize and give you page numbers. Im going to start with criminal justice stuff (of course) and then well wander through other topics like repro rights (none), discrimination (fine, unless its against nuclear power), environmental protection (gone), etc
Predictably, this is a document full of states-rights claims, but (true to form) there is very little left to the states when it comes to a Trump criminal legal system.
Generally, the Constitution reserves criminal law to the states, allowing localities to create criminal accountability as they see fit. But under a Trump regime, small government just means no EPA or medicare and HUGE expansions of DOJs criminal division power.
A primary target? The discretion and decision-making of local prosecutors.
Prosecutorial discretion is part of the foundation of our legal systemthe idea that the people elect their prosecutor, and can elect (or not elect) a person whose judgment they agree with when it comes to what to focus on when it comes to criminal prosecution.
The Trump DOJ will basically override local voters and prosecutors, bringing federal charges where they deem states not punitive enough. (553)
I should note that this is a ridiculous, massively difficult thing to doour criminal court system is spread across 3,143 counties.
So what it really means is that the Trump DOJ will troll for cases they find politically meaningful, and use the full weight of the federal government to prosecute specific individuals who stand for stuff they dont like.
Theyre not just going to take on targeted prosecutions, theyre also going to legally come after prosecutors who they feel arent prosecuting enough. (553) Its like this, but EVERYWHERE
And somehow theyre also going to do everything they can to make sentences harsher, and increase utilization of the death penalty (553-554).
There's more, that's just a taste. It's way too long to publish the whole thing here, so it's in my dropbox for anyone who wants to read/download it all.
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/urpntk00yekl0tqdvv5yw/Project-2025-Emily-Galvin-Almanza.pdf?rlkey=5ey4m8xq2hgs1tji45m2wxote&st=9zvcjbjk&dl=0
Plus here are the links to the original stuff. So long that it's in three parts.