Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Hill: Harris says she'll be at the debate [View all]EndlessWire
(8,103 posts)11. I don't think it's a good idea.
She might have prepped to handle the gish gallop, but she doesn't need to do it. She holds the high ground. Trump/Vance both pulled out from the debates. She's just being jerked around by the Orange Hellbeast (c. S.B.). I'd move on and go to a swing state that needs talking to. Donald shouldn't be allowed to repeat his performance trying to make her look weak. She has nothing to prove. He won't be there to debate.
His cowardice has already been shown. He's afraid of strong women. He can only beat up weak women. Kamala is strong, doesn't have Covid, and can wipe the floor with him. It is a waste of her time.
I get it that this would be an opportunity for air time. Make a speech in a swing state. Still get on air.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Also, it's not like Obama was supposed to be at the convention and backed out
NYC Liberal
Jul 2024
#38
Seriously, no. Kamala Harris has nothing whatsoever to gain and everything to lose.
valleyrogue
Jul 2024
#9