Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: - add live feed- Garland-- is warning the CONvicted felon and his MAGAts about [View all]Nevilledog
(53,354 posts)38. The internet has sniffed out the RW media personalities
Link to tweet
David Corn
@DavidCornDC
·
Follow
Big news! DOJ indictment says Russia (via RT) funneled $9.7m to an unidentified US media firm for content to sow discontent in the US. It says firm calls itself a "network of heterodox commentators that focus on Western political and cultural issues." That matches the description of Tenet Mediaa collection of rightwing/libertarian commentators, including Tim Pool, Benny Johnson, and Dave Rubin.
tenetmedia.com
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
10 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
128 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
- add live feed- Garland-- is warning the CONvicted felon and his MAGAts about [View all]
malaise
Sep 2024
OP
Restaurant has a problem, though. The patrons usually die of malnutrition waiting to be served.
jaxexpat
Sep 2024
#26
Perhaps you can look at your justice system rather than the people trying to exact justice
Bev54
Sep 2024
#70
That's fair, I suppose, and still the fact remains, the most exemplary model of our problem-plagued...........
jaxexpat
Sep 2024
#76
Wouldn't a crime have to be committed, or evidence of a conspiracy surface for DOJ to "do something"?
Fiendish Thingy
Sep 2024
#11
What's enough, then. No one will agree on that, either. Most people talk as if only perfect is enough,
ancianita
Sep 2024
#64
LOL! I don't think there's any need for us to parse how close to perfect is enough.
Scrivener7
Sep 2024
#82
Laugh all you like. There is one conversation about Garland that we're going to need. The numbers conversation, and
ancianita
Sep 2024
#88
Well if you did the research you will find proof of the opposite but then that doesn't fit
Bev54
Sep 2024
#109
They'd find "proof of the opposite" of what, exactly? And what's the narrative, again?
ancianita
Sep 2024
#122
Ah, okay, now I understand. Thanks. And yes, they would find out the opposite, but then why bother when
ancianita
Sep 2024
#127
That's probably a little strong, but Garland did drag his feet on the Trump prosecutions early on.
D23MIURG23
Sep 2024
#90
It's actually based on investigative reporting that Garland actively resisted investigating Trump.
D23MIURG23
Sep 2024
#94
The upshot of the report is that Garland didn't push because he wanted "normal".
D23MIURG23
Sep 2024
#98
This combination of actors is such that, if you just flood the zone with crimes, only
Scrivener7
Sep 2024
#81
If you threaten to harm or kill an election worker or official or volunteer the Justice Department will find you...
pecosbob
Sep 2024
#16
I thought he might mention Jan 6 and fake electors, which were domestic efforts to interfere with elections. And as
wiggs
Sep 2024
#21
Because that would amount to actually doing something, I suppose. This DOJ has gotten to and rooted out.....
jaxexpat
Sep 2024
#28
The statute of limitations is winding down, they're not scared of someone who has yet to put a ringleader on trial.
ArkansasDemocrat1
Sep 2024
#35
Well, not act exactly. More like warn in an even more sternly worded manner.
Scrivener7
Sep 2024
#80
This will be the first of only 878 warnings. Then there will be consequences. nt
LexVegas
Sep 2024
#44
It's like, "Stop! I'm warning you! And if you don't stop, I shall warn you again!"
Wednesdays
Sep 2024
#48
But, of course, first consequences will have to be scheduled. And that takes time.
Scrivener7
Sep 2024
#79
I like it! I know Garland has a bad rep...well deserved...but he just totally ruined the MAGAts Christmas.
BComplex
Sep 2024
#46
Thank you so much for posting this, Malaise. I was arguing with someone on here a few weeks
PatrickforB
Sep 2024
#52