General Discussion

The absence of public information is not evidence of Garland “dragging his feet”.

In fact, Garland persisted despite resistance and obstruction from Trump loyal FBI career employees.

Thanks to Garland, when Cannon dismissed the docs case and voided all evidence and testimony collected by Smith, there was still a substantial core of evidence remaining that Garland’s team had collected from the search at Mar a Lago before Smith was appointed.

The argument over Garland’s investigations of Trump has been debated for years on DU, with verifiable facts consistently revealing the truth when compared to emotional arguments based on opinions derived from the lack of public information available during the first couple of years of the investigations.

The fact that Garland bashing has resurfaced now means we are in a post Labor day news lull, and things are going so well for Harris that some folks need something to argue about, and I guess this is it.