Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: - add live feed- Garland-- is warning the CONvicted felon and his MAGAts about [View all]MorbidButterflyTat
(2,660 posts)93. That is unfair and disgusting.
However a clear use of a thesaurus.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
128 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
- add live feed- Garland-- is warning the CONvicted felon and his MAGAts about [View all]
malaise
Sep 2024
OP
Restaurant has a problem, though. The patrons usually die of malnutrition waiting to be served.
jaxexpat
Sep 2024
#26
Perhaps you can look at your justice system rather than the people trying to exact justice
Bev54
Sep 2024
#70
That's fair, I suppose, and still the fact remains, the most exemplary model of our problem-plagued...........
jaxexpat
Sep 2024
#76
Wouldn't a crime have to be committed, or evidence of a conspiracy surface for DOJ to "do something"?
Fiendish Thingy
Sep 2024
#11
What's enough, then. No one will agree on that, either. Most people talk as if only perfect is enough,
ancianita
Sep 2024
#64
LOL! I don't think there's any need for us to parse how close to perfect is enough.
Scrivener7
Sep 2024
#82
Laugh all you like. There is one conversation about Garland that we're going to need. The numbers conversation, and
ancianita
Sep 2024
#88
Well if you did the research you will find proof of the opposite but then that doesn't fit
Bev54
Sep 2024
#109
They'd find "proof of the opposite" of what, exactly? And what's the narrative, again?
ancianita
Sep 2024
#122
Ah, okay, now I understand. Thanks. And yes, they would find out the opposite, but then why bother when
ancianita
Sep 2024
#127
That's probably a little strong, but Garland did drag his feet on the Trump prosecutions early on.
D23MIURG23
Sep 2024
#90
It's actually based on investigative reporting that Garland actively resisted investigating Trump.
D23MIURG23
Sep 2024
#94
The upshot of the report is that Garland didn't push because he wanted "normal".
D23MIURG23
Sep 2024
#98
This combination of actors is such that, if you just flood the zone with crimes, only
Scrivener7
Sep 2024
#81
If you threaten to harm or kill an election worker or official or volunteer the Justice Department will find you...
pecosbob
Sep 2024
#16
I thought he might mention Jan 6 and fake electors, which were domestic efforts to interfere with elections. And as
wiggs
Sep 2024
#21
Because that would amount to actually doing something, I suppose. This DOJ has gotten to and rooted out.....
jaxexpat
Sep 2024
#28
The statute of limitations is winding down, they're not scared of someone who has yet to put a ringleader on trial.
ArkansasDemocrat1
Sep 2024
#35
Well, not act exactly. More like warn in an even more sternly worded manner.
Scrivener7
Sep 2024
#80
This will be the first of only 878 warnings. Then there will be consequences. nt
LexVegas
Sep 2024
#44
It's like, "Stop! I'm warning you! And if you don't stop, I shall warn you again!"
Wednesdays
Sep 2024
#48
But, of course, first consequences will have to be scheduled. And that takes time.
Scrivener7
Sep 2024
#79
I like it! I know Garland has a bad rep...well deserved...but he just totally ruined the MAGAts Christmas.
BComplex
Sep 2024
#46
Thank you so much for posting this, Malaise. I was arguing with someone on here a few weeks
PatrickforB
Sep 2024
#52