Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Can you guys answer Andrea Mitchell's question? [View all]Oopsie Daisy
(4,692 posts)59. I cannot stand her. She behaves like old drone with only contempt and bitterness for Democrats, it's always on display.
She's really not as clever or as subtle as she thinks she's being. She did the same thing with Hillary. It was as though she had some sort of feud going on, or that she was out to get revenge on the Clintons. Regardless of her motivations, it's obvious that her best days are behind her. She's been allowed to hang on for far too long. I can think of nothing of value that she brings to the table. MSNBC needs to put her out to pasture and release her from her contract so that she can be free to join Fox.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
71 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Fire Comrade Andrea !!!!!!!! Old whiney witch is too incompitent to be on the air.
Trueblue1968
Sep 2024
#29
I would say there is a definite risk of Ms. Mitchell of appearing too nasty. Seriously though, this is the same pattern
JohnSJ
Sep 2024
#2
Yep. And since nasty is in the eye of the beholder, ANYTHING Harris says will be labeled 'nasty'
Attilatheblond
Sep 2024
#17
If she isn't speaking in a little fundie baby voice and stands up to Trump, I don't think I need to tell you what we're
brewens
Sep 2024
#7
She doesn't need to be nasty, a former CA-AG she knows exactly how she's going eviserate him in a conversational tone.
marble falls
Sep 2024
#8
Women are "nasty' if their retort is considered tough. Men are considered aggressive.
Fla Dem
Sep 2024
#26
It's Mitchell's Catch-22 scenario. By her reasoning, Harris is screwed whether she plays by the rules or gets nasty.
Efilroft Sul
Sep 2024
#34
As the Bard of Avon would say: "Begone Andrea, thou rascally spur-galled measle!"
C0RI0LANUS
Sep 2024
#35
women are either too nasty or too submissive. this sexist trope needs to get buried.
Voltaire2
Sep 2024
#36
She picked up the word "nasty" from trump. He now calls anyone who doesn't suck his d**k 'nasty! '
HUAJIAO
Sep 2024
#41
According to Trump all women are "too nasty". It doesn't matter what she does he will
doc03
Sep 2024
#45
Funny how a woman can be criticized for both laughing too much and for being nasty.
femmedem
Sep 2024
#51
I cannot stand her. She behaves like old drone with only contempt and bitterness for Democrats, it's always on display.
Oopsie Daisy
Sep 2024
#59
Good gawd...she said she was retiring at least two yrs back...come on go the F away!
PortTack
Sep 2024
#60