Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Test your susceptibility to misinformation with this Cambridge test. Good luck. [View all]Jmb 4 Harris-Walz
(1,049 posts)42. Guess I'm very skeptical
👍 Good try!
You're more resilient to misinformation than 44% of the US population!
📈 Your MIST-20 results: 14/20
Veracity Discernment: 40% (ability to accurately distinguish real news from fake news)
Real News Detection: 40% (ability to correctly identify real news)
Fake News Detection: 100% (ability to correctly identify fake news)
Distrust/Naïvité: -6 (ranges from -10 to +10, overly skeptical to overly gullible)
👉 Your ability to recognize real and fake news is good! You might be very skeptical when it comes to the news.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
139 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Test your susceptibility to misinformation with this Cambridge test. Good luck. [View all]
brewens
Oct 5
OP
You can take it over and over, but I can't figure out which one I missed because now I've got 20/20 correct.
LeftInTX
Oct 5
#58
I marked it real if it sounded plausible and fake if it sounded implausible/crazy.
Crunchy Frog
Oct 7
#136
What was your answer on the eye color question? I was reluctant to say yes but I'm sure I had seen studies saying
Quixote1818
Oct 6
#83
Agree. I got the hotel bottel one wrong too but I stay in hotels for work all the time.
Quixote1818
Oct 6
#89
Yeah, I should have gone with my gut feeling. I was probably more inclined to believe the limited studies becaues
Quixote1818
Oct 6
#95
A MAGAt or other tin-foil-hat wearer would tell you the test was designed to test...
RidinWithHarris
Oct 5
#53
Yup. Pretty much a waste of time around here. As I suspected. MAGAts would be afraid to take it, so this
brewens
Oct 5
#33
"Veracity Discernment: 100% (ability to accurately distinguish real news from fake news)"
LudwigPastorius
Oct 5
#43
I think I missed the trust question. I was thinking big picture as in the last few decades and losing trust because
brewens
Oct 5
#63
Hmmm. I said they didn't remove the small bottles from the bathrooms. Maybe that was it. n/t
brewens
Oct 6
#102
I don't mind multi-use. Unfortunately, I likely just read the headline and I interpreted it as: "Pack soap & shampoo"
LeftInTX
Oct 6
#118
17 out of 20 I wonder if I got the one about eye color wrong but I had seen several studies on this
Quixote1818
Oct 6
#82
19/20 here. It was much faster when I chose not to be considered in their study. n/t
woodsprite
Oct 6
#130