Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Test your susceptibility to misinformation with this Cambridge test. Good luck. [View all]yardwork
(65,656 posts)86. I don't think you did poorly.
You sound like a skeptical person, and that's a good trait to have in these times.
This test blurs the difference between believing conspiracy theories and having rational skepticism.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
139 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Test your susceptibility to misinformation with this Cambridge test. Good luck. [View all]
brewens
Oct 2024
OP
You can take it over and over, but I can't figure out which one I missed because now I've got 20/20 correct.
LeftInTX
Oct 2024
#58
I marked it real if it sounded plausible and fake if it sounded implausible/crazy.
Crunchy Frog
Oct 2024
#136
What was your answer on the eye color question? I was reluctant to say yes but I'm sure I had seen studies saying
Quixote1818
Oct 2024
#83
Agree. I got the hotel bottel one wrong too but I stay in hotels for work all the time.
Quixote1818
Oct 2024
#89
Yeah, I should have gone with my gut feeling. I was probably more inclined to believe the limited studies becaues
Quixote1818
Oct 2024
#95
A MAGAt or other tin-foil-hat wearer would tell you the test was designed to test...
RidinWithHarris
Oct 2024
#53
Yup. Pretty much a waste of time around here. As I suspected. MAGAts would be afraid to take it, so this
brewens
Oct 2024
#33
"Veracity Discernment: 100% (ability to accurately distinguish real news from fake news)"
LudwigPastorius
Oct 2024
#43
I think I missed the trust question. I was thinking big picture as in the last few decades and losing trust because
brewens
Oct 2024
#63
Hmmm. I said they didn't remove the small bottles from the bathrooms. Maybe that was it. n/t
brewens
Oct 2024
#102
I don't mind multi-use. Unfortunately, I likely just read the headline and I interpreted it as: "Pack soap & shampoo"
LeftInTX
Oct 2024
#118
It's the only question that didn't, from my perspective, have a correct answer.
Ms. Toad
Oct 2024
#127
17 out of 20 I wonder if I got the one about eye color wrong but I had seen several studies on this
Quixote1818
Oct 2024
#82
19/20 here. It was much faster when I chose not to be considered in their study. n/t
woodsprite
Oct 2024
#130