Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Regarding the New York Times, America's 'newspaper of record.' [View all]cutroot
(989 posts)3. Calling it a horse race would indicate that they would promote the losing side to keep things even
We know that is not true. They would continue to pound the Democrats either way. Let’s call it what it is…. Right wing fish wrap.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
6 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You know, I heard on MSNBC that the Trump campaign admitted they had spent millions on
PatrickforB
Oct 2024
#6
NYT has an overwhelmingly high percentage of readership by Democrats. Making a profit, requires readership.
Silent Type
Oct 2024
#2
Calling it a horse race would indicate that they would promote the losing side to keep things even
cutroot
Oct 2024
#3
I find the NYT to be different from what you are saying here. I find nothing outrageous about their reporting or about
CTyankee
Oct 2024
#5
Money, money and more money. That's the point even with supermajority owned companies.
paleotn
Oct 2024
#24
No, not at all. Because it was a long time coming, and I'm considering the coverage for the entire year,
PatrickforB
Oct 2024
#58
It is also why billionaires buy news organizations. They profit in many other ways than just ratings or clicks/
KPN
Oct 2024
#17
Kudos to you! I used to read the NYT front to back..not the sports, and loved it. Gave up on them a few yrs back
PortTack
Oct 2024
#27
"AND Reagan killing the Fairness Doctrine back in '87" It is amazing how much damage Reagan did to the USA
Escurumbele
Oct 2024
#32
He doesn't get much play because he went off the deep end. Embracing conspiracy theories, Putin,
tritsofme
Oct 2024
#47
So you think the pro-Putin nonsense, making excuses for Trump is...good journalism?
tritsofme
Oct 2024
#49
I cancelled my NYT subscription back in 2015 due to Clinton email coverage
LetMyPeopleVote
Oct 2024
#39
Take the money out of elections and the MSM's motivation and actions become irrelevant.
pecosbob
Oct 2024
#55