Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

spooky3

(36,391 posts)

2. They separated out "falsehoods", inaccuracies, exaggerations, and comments needing

Reply to eppur_se_muova (Reply #1)

Sun Oct 6, 2024, 03:14 PM

Oct 6

Context-and some other categories. I just shortened it in my subject line to make the point that there is NO equivalence between the candidates.

And I totally agree with you.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

NYT fact checks speeches: Harris, 6 inaccuracies; Trump, 10x that many [View all] spooky3 Oct 6 OP

tfg doesn't commit "inaccuracies", he cranks out delusional shit at random, knows ONLY his base believes it. eppur_se_muova Oct 6 #1

They separated out "falsehoods", inaccuracies, exaggerations, and comments needing spooky3 Oct 6 #2

No problem ! I gave it 50-50 that they would do that. No high confidence in NYT these days. nt eppur_se_muova Oct 6 #4

They are not right on Harris. nt BootinUp Oct 6 #3

64 in 63 minutes malaise Oct 6 #5