Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

TheKentuckian

(26,314 posts)

12. Because the UN doesn't condemn the attack and many if not most members

Reply to JohnSJ (Original post)

Wed Oct 16, 2024, 06:08 AM

Oct 16

cheer it.

Hell, the UN is a de facto sponsor posing as as an aid program for decades promoting radicalization and fostering grievances while doing little else but acting as a platform for theocracies, promoters of terrorism, nations corrupt to the core, and authoritarian states to rail about bullshit.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

JohnSJ Behind the Aegis

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why hasn't the U.N. General Assembly has failed to pass any resolution condemning Hamas for the October 7th attack. [View all] JohnSJ Oct 15 OP

Resistance DeepWinter Oct 15 #1

Thanks. JohnSJ Oct 15 #2

Oh, they're united all right, MarineCombatEngineer Oct 15 #3

Lets see.... EX500rider Oct 15 #4

There was an attempt by the General Assembly moniss Oct 15 #5

Here's the voting on Canada's L.26 draft amendment condemning the Hamas attack: muriel_volestrangler Oct 16 #14

They would be much more likely to pass a resolution congratulating Hamas for the attack. tritsofme Oct 15 #6

I was about to say the same thing sarisataka Oct 15 #7

(((Guess))) Behind the Aegis Oct 15 #8

Which also accounts for why EllieBC Oct 15 #9

It doesn't take a rocket scientist. JohnSJ Oct 15 #10

That fact answers any question about the UN. Boomerproud Oct 15 #11

Because the UN doesn't condemn the attack and many if not most members TheKentuckian Oct 16 #12

Yes. If it was a credible institution it would not have been difficult to condemn what happened on October 7, and that JohnSJ Oct 16 #13