General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Rigged? Computer Security Experts Urge Harris To Demand Hand Recount [View all]CaptainTruth
(7,251 posts)God I'm so tired of hearing that word.
It's about ELECTION INTEGRITY!
No matter what happens in any election we should have a system of statistical sampling in place that allows us to have a high degree of confidence in the accuracy of the result. And when I say "degree of confidence" I'm not talking about our feelings I'm talking about a statical degree of confidence or confidence level, mathematically calculated according to the sampling method.
If you understand statistics or quality control programs in manufacturing (where a small percentage of products are sampled & tested to achieve a high statical level of confidence in the quality of all the products) you understand this concept.
None of it is "conspiracy," it's science, it's math. It's done to ensure the quality of darn near every product you buy from your car to your refrigerator to your toaster.
Call me crazy if you want, but I believe American elections should have at least as much quality control as a toaster.
So yes, hand recount ballots in several selected precincts/counties/whatever in EVERY election regardless of anyone's theories, as quality control. There are even international QC standards like ISO 8402, ISO 9000, & ISO 9001 that might be helpful. They're use to ensure the quality of your toaster... but not our elections. It drives me nuts.