General Discussion

uponit7771

(92,384 posts)

47. I want investigation into **ANY** involvement you want investigation into an element of ...

Reply to Abnredleg (Reply #45)

Sun Nov 17, 2024, 01:30 PM

Nov 2024

... involvement. I didn't see how either want as conspiracy theories.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

125 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Yes or no did Starlink upload, download, or host election data? [View all] Botany Nov 2024 OP

This would be a great question for the FBI/CIA before they are fully disbanded. travelingthrulife Nov 2024 #1

RIGHT HERE !!! 👆🏿👆🏿👆🏿 uponit7771 Nov 2024 #40

Yes tintinvotes Nov 2024 #2

No Abnredleg Nov 2024 #3

? tintinvotes Nov 2024 #5

Not for voting data Abnredleg Nov 2024 #7

Proof? tintinvotes Nov 2024 #9

The County in question denies your claim Abnredleg Nov 2024 #10

So no investigation? tintinvotes Nov 2024 #13

Sorry, but the burden of proof just shifted Abnredleg Nov 2024 #17

Trust, but don't verify tintinvotes Nov 2024 #24

You need probable cause for an investigation Abnredleg Nov 2024 #28

Probable Cause tintinvotes Nov 2024 #33

Right... People keep moving the goal post uponit7771 Nov 2024 #36

No - people keep expanding the conspiracy Abnredleg Nov 2024 #45

I want investigation into **ANY** involvement you want investigation into an element of ... uponit7771 Nov 2024 #47

Send a tip to the FBI or DOJ. DiamondShark Nov 2024 #85

I trust the experts on this Abnredleg Nov 2024 #44

Like these experts? tintinvotes Nov 2024 #46

The Cyber Ninjas were "experts" Abnredleg Nov 2024 #53

Precedent tintinvotes Nov 2024 #69

We're better than the GOP Abnredleg Nov 2024 #77

Always verify tintinvotes Nov 2024 #82

An AI authored article is your evidence???? AZSkiffyGeek Nov 2024 #55

Do you have a link for this? karin_sj Nov 2024 #54

Google tintinvotes Nov 2024 #62

So, Starlink was responsible for uploading voter registration information? Baitball Blogger Nov 2024 #16

How would those things be related? EdmondDantes_ Nov 2024 #18

North Carolina was not a swingstate. Baitball Blogger Nov 2024 #20

North Carolina is considered a swing state EdmondDantes_ Nov 2024 #51

No Abnredleg Nov 2024 #19

You are correct LetMyPeopleVote Nov 2024 #72

But Starlink could be used to transmit the data from the local tabulation centers to the state SOS office probably. LiberalArkie Nov 2024 #101

Yes, but that's usually a manual process Abnredleg Nov 2024 #103

You just admitted that starlink was used. garybeck Nov 2024 #26

Not the case Abnredleg Nov 2024 #30

Was star link used? Yes? ...then start investigating... eos uponit7771 Nov 2024 #37

Why investigate the impossible? Abnredleg Nov 2024 #38

It's impossible for star link to be involved in election in any way? I'm calling for an investigation into uponit7771 Nov 2024 #39

You're being deliberately misleading Abnredleg Nov 2024 #42

They sound just like the MAGATs in 2020 AZSkiffyGeek Nov 2024 #58

Starlink, T-Mobile, AT&T, Cox, Comcast... DiamondShark Nov 2024 #89

Almost all jurisdictions forbid connecting to Internet Abnredleg Nov 2024 #4

The question is not at the voting machines but @ the Central Tabulators Botany Nov 2024 #6

Same legal requirements as voting machines Abnredleg Nov 2024 #8

The central tabulators take the precinct numbers and add them up for the state. They are a known vulnerability. garybeck Nov 2024 #29

Tabulators are airgapped Abnredleg Nov 2024 #31

Funny you didn't even know what a central tabulator was just a short time ago and now you know Botany Nov 2024 #52

Because ALL election equipment is airgapped Abnredleg Nov 2024 #57

Most of your questions could be solved by being a poll watcher. DiamondShark Nov 2024 #106

Thank you! Botany Nov 2024 #48

Not to mention , the memory cards garybeck Nov 2024 #27

Which is why they have strict chain of custody requirements Abnredleg Nov 2024 #35

Google works Sympthsical Nov 2024 #11

DU is a wonderful resource thank you very much. Botany Nov 2024 #12

Clearly there are some issues with factual information this week Sympthsical Nov 2024 #14

How about presenting proof Abnredleg Nov 2024 #15

I have done election protection work for 20 years. Botany Nov 2024 #21

Nice meaningless diversion Abnredleg Nov 2024 #22

I'm just looking for clues at the scene of the crime. Botany Nov 2024 #25

I'll accept your concession Abnredleg Nov 2024 #32

The official canvassing is days after the early count. Igel Nov 2024 #41

All of them? I've only read generic statements from anonymous names Cetacea Nov 18 #120

Great list of info, but guarantee more threads on the rigged election in following weeks, maybe next year or so. Silent Type Nov 2024 #23

Some Democrats are achieving parity SCantiGOP Nov 2024 #43

THANK YOU!!! uponit7771 Nov 2024 #34

SNOPES says no... it's silly. WarGamer Nov 2024 #49

No Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 2024 #50

Phone lines Autisminsight Nov 2024 #56

I've worked in the telecommunication field for 45 years. Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 2024 #59

Lots of misinformation on this thread. Botany Nov 2024 #74

Zipper, huh? The Revolution Nov 2024 #96

Much like Virginia SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2024 #111

They manually enter the data into the state system Abnredleg Nov 2024 #60

Those are "media reports" LeftInTX Nov 18 #114

so... this is some sort of what exactly? lapfog_1 Nov 2024 #61

Most jurisdictions now use paper ballots Abnredleg Nov 2024 #64

I have never met a "security protocol" that I or a sufficient talented hacker lapfog_1 Nov 2024 #67

True Abnredleg Nov 2024 #78

Yes... Think. Again. Nov 2024 #63

but begs the question lapfog_1 Nov 2024 #65

Yes, I absolutely agree this starlink election connection must be thoroughly investigated. Think. Again. Nov 2024 #66

You have been corrected on this exact story multiple times on DU Zeitghost Nov 2024 #68

I have certainly not been "corrected" sinc no one has clarified what.... Think. Again. Nov 2024 #70

As it has been explained to you over and over Zeitghost Nov 2024 #71

Yeah, I rmember reading that... Think. Again. Nov 2024 #75

Your reading comprehension needs some work Abnredleg Nov 2024 #79

You just wrote, in the same sentence..... Think. Again. Nov 2024 #80

Because you are deliberately misrepresenting what I wrote Abnredleg Nov 2024 #81

Hey, friend, I understand you are very much against basic verification of the 2024 results... Think. Again. Nov 2024 #83

Actually, we are talking about paper data Abnredleg Nov 2024 #84

Yes, that complaint that we shouldn't question the accuracy of ... Think. Again. Nov 2024 #86

The checks you want are already being done Abnredleg Nov 2024 #87

Nope, no checks are being done to look for anything except "close margins". Think. Again. Nov 2024 #90

Here is an emergency petition link on change.org Linda ladeewolf Nov 2024 #88

It's a petition for a coup /nt Abnredleg Nov 2024 #91

Maybe you don't understand what a coup is? Think. Again. Nov 2024 #93

Wow, I didn't know you had such a long history here. DiamondShark Nov 2024 #94

Are you under the impression I started DU? Think. Again. Nov 2024 #97

Did you? DiamondShark Nov 2024 #107

Why do you think I've been here longer than I have? Think. Again. Nov 2024 #108

This message was self-deleted by its author DiamondShark Nov 2024 #109

Please post a source for your claim. DiamondShark Nov 2024 #110

I would have to look for it... Think. Again. Nov 2024 #112

I'll keep this post bookmarked. DiamondShark Nov 2024 #113

Or maybe... Think. Again. Nov 18 #115

You're hilarious. DiamondShark Nov 18 #116

I'm pretty sure concessions have to be made first... Think. Again. Nov 18 #117

Clearly, you can't backup a statement you made. DiamondShark Nov 18 #118

Hey! This is interesting! Did you know about this??? Think. Again. Nov 18 #119

Is this gaslighting? This isn't what you said the first time. DiamondShark Nov 18 #121

Yes, you do seem to be gaslighting me.. Think. Again. Nov 18 #122

Highlighted for readability. DiamondShark Nov 18 #123

You're pretending there's a contradiction that doesn't exist. Think. Again. Nov 18 #124

It was actually number 2. DiamondShark Nov 18 #125

There is no proof of fraud Abnredleg Nov 2024 #95

You are erroneously speaking for other people... Think. Again. Nov 2024 #98

And they won't speak out Abnredleg Nov 2024 #99

So you admit you were lying when you said... Think. Again. Nov 2024 #100

They all issued statements accepting the election. Abnredleg Nov 2024 #102

Again, none of those people have made any public statements on the matter we are discussing.... Think. Again. Nov 2024 #104

A snip from that petition soandso Nov 2024 #105

Thank you! Think. Again. Nov 2024 #92

FACT FOCUS: Election officials knock down Starlink vote rigging conspiracy theories LetMyPeopleVote Nov 2024 #73

You mean from all the lawsuits of bamboo ballots in 2021? bucolic_frolic Nov 2024 #76