Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Sympthsical

(10,411 posts)
12. If insisting on facts and evidence is an "attack"
Sun Nov 17, 2024, 08:31 PM
Nov 17

Don't you think that requires a reconsideration of one's position? If you're holding a position where logic and evidence feel like a negative for the ideas you hold, are those really good ideas to hold then?

(And you've responded in tons of these threads just fine. No need to call out others for same)

I do not want misinformation, false hope, conspiracy theorizing, or narrative over truth to take hold in my party. We just spent four years going after Republicans for this stuff, where they "feel" 2020 wasn't right.

This isn't even kind of hard to understand why this stuff needs to be pushed back against and given zero quarter.

"That's bad . . . unless I do it" isn't an admirable life philosophy to aspire to.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»No one should comment on ...»Reply #12