Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

rampartd

(719 posts)
40. "liberal new york times"
Mon Nov 18, 2024, 02:08 AM
Nov 18

has made me cringe ever since the "weapons of mass destruction." .


Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Thanks for this 😊 Blue_Tires Nov 17 #1
that one is a few years too late. rampartd Nov 17 #2
They can never undo all of their sane-washing wolfie001 Nov 17 #23
"liberal new york times" rampartd Nov 18 #40
Judith Miller barf wolfie001 Nov 18 #48
oh NOW they say it Skittles Nov 17 #3
"They" aren't saying it. This is a Roxanne Gay Op-Ed. maxsolomon Nov 18 #56
The NY Times encouraged and supported, actively, Trump, both in 2016 and in 2024. Fuck that "but her emails..." "old... NNadir Nov 17 #4
For ALL practical purposes, simply put DENVERPOPS Nov 18 #51
Oh wow NOW a warning? mountain grammy Nov 17 #5
Since its an Opinion/Editorial by Roxanne Gay maxsolomon Nov 18 #53
And yet, somehow, they couldn't endorse Harris. Grumpy Old Guy Nov 17 #6
I'm pretty sure NYT DID endorse VP Harris Seeking Serenity Nov 17 #8
False Shrek Nov 17 #13
It was the Washington Post that didn't endorse her radical noodle Nov 17 #14
I stand corrected. Grumpy Old Guy Nov 17 #30
And yet you did not correct the post that accused them of not endorsing Harris maxsolomon Nov 18 #52
No, the Washington Post refused endorsements, whathehell Nov 18 #49
Wtf?? WE'VE been saying the exact same B.See Nov 17 #7
Great piece by Contributing Opinion Writer Roxane Gay. Pinback Nov 17 #9
This piece makes a too-common, WRONG assumption about who "we" are. 22% of Americans is NOT who 78% of Americans are. ancianita Nov 17 #10
Thank you for that. If only we could convince more to vote. Hermit-The-Prog Nov 17 #18
YW. Just mapping it out helps. ancianita Nov 17 #21
Brilliant response - thank you! jmbar2 Nov 17 #24
Absolutely! ancianita Nov 17 #25
I really like your fighting spirit jmbar2 Nov 17 #26
Awwww, hell to the YEAH !!! Seinan Sensei Nov 17 #28
i love what you wrote but where are you getting the 22% number (and the 78% number)? nt orleans Nov 17 #32
Thanks. Sure. ancianita Nov 17 #33
got it! thank you! orleans Nov 17 #35
29% of US voting age population voted for Trump in 2024. SomewhereInTheMiddle Nov 18 #42
Exactly. ancianita Nov 18 #44
76,510,127 / 244,666,890 eligible-to-vote equals 31.3% of those eligible to vote voted for tRump nmmi Nov 18 #47
If you want to use a university from Florida, run by Sasse/Fuchs, I'm not going to argue about eligible vote numbers. ancianita Nov 18 #57
If you have any other source, I will gladly use that. nmmi Nov 18 #73
Sure. I live in Florida and since covid, don't trust Florida's govt or RW universities. I use other sources. ancianita Nov 18 #74
Sorry, but as I patiently pointed out, not everyone who is over 18 can legally vote - e.g. non-citizens. a lot of felons nmmi Nov 18 #75
If you want the electorate population, you have to do the math as shown in my posts above. ancianita Nov 18 #76
Uh, err, you forgot that many felons can't vote. And the undocumented population is a subset of non-citizens nmmi Nov 18 #77
I think the "electorate" as the denominator... reACTIONary Nov 18 #50
I do, too, since it's the bigger population that, divided into Trump votes, shows them as a percent of ancianita Nov 18 #58
Sorry, but no Cosmocat Nov 18 #43
Worth considering, so here goes. ancianita Nov 18 #45
but 346,134,190 is not of voting age mahina Nov 18 #81
Right F'ckn On! montanacowboy Nov 17 #11
No thanks mcar Nov 17 #12
Where were they in the last days before the election? brush Nov 17 #15
They had their heads buried in the sand sakabatou Nov 17 #16
Did you read the same NYT I did in the last days before the election? maxsolomon Nov 18 #55
I watched NYT staffers on cable constantly bash Biden/Harris. brush Nov 18 #61
I'm defending it because I don't believe its the malign actor that you do, maxsolomon Nov 18 #62
Oh please. The NYT is ust about as complicit in not going after the 'weaving', white supremacist asshole that is tsrump. brush Nov 18 #63
What am I supposed to subscribe to? The Daily Worker? maxsolomon Nov 18 #68
Seems to me the NYT bashed Biden/Harris as much as you allege it declared trump unfit. brush Nov 18 #70
The NYT has been an active participant in the propaganda network. Hermit-The-Prog Nov 17 #17
Exactly. ancianita Nov 17 #27
Dietrich Bonhoeffer said stupid prople are the most dangerous Beck23 Nov 17 #19
Yes, and Bonhoeffer knew why. ancianita Nov 17 #29
A NYT opinion column that nails it. MLWR Nov 17 #20
Too little, too late. Fuck the NYT. (nt) Paladin Nov 17 #22
IMO, Harris still had the best chance. Any other dem would have done much worse AlexSFCA Nov 17 #31
Agree. ancianita Nov 17 #36
Roxane Gay, a contributing Opinion writer, continues... Hekate Nov 17 #34
I wonder... kevinore Nov 17 #37
Archive littlemissmartypants Nov 17 #38
Day late and several dollars short relayerbob Nov 18 #39
Too little, too late. Old Crank Nov 18 #41
To my knowledge PennRalphie Nov 18 #46
Said it the other day... krkaufman Nov 18 #54
Another good piece... krkaufman Nov 19 #84
There were several excellent op-ed columns in yesterday's NYT bif Nov 18 #59
That's the most important thing. maxsolomon Nov 18 #60
I still subscribe to the NYTimes because they have some great writers and reporters (and the crossword and games), but LymphocyteLover Nov 18 #65
Can you point at a single mainstream US newspaper whose priorities weren't "warped"? maxsolomon Nov 18 #69
Actually our Detroit Free Press is pretty decent. bif Nov 18 #71
In what way? maxsolomon Nov 18 #78
Do you work for them? JustAnotherGen Nov 18 #80
I don't work for them. Are you serious? maxsolomon Nov 18 #82
I don't know. My local paper avoids partisan politics as much as they can. Seemed like the Philadelphia Enquirer LymphocyteLover Nov 18 #83
OMG yes! The people most under-represented in the media are regular sane Democrats like us!!! LymphocyteLover Nov 18 #64
I love the NYT's Sunday Edition bif Nov 18 #66
Where were they JustAnotherGen Nov 18 #67
Tell me you don't read the NYT without telling me you don't read the NYT. maxsolomon Nov 18 #72
Ah - yeah i didn't and won't JustAnotherGen Nov 18 #79
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A NYT opinion column that...»Reply #40