Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Think. Again.

(17,955 posts)
124. You're pretending there's a contradiction that doesn't exist.
Mon Nov 18, 2024, 01:25 PM
Monday

"psychological manipulation of a person usually over an extended period of time that causes the victim to question the validity of their own thoughts, perception of reality, or memories and typically leads to confusion, loss of confidence and self-esteem, uncertainty of one's emotional or mental stability, and a dependency on the perpetrator."

It's time for me to disengage.

Thank you for your input.

This would be a great question for the FBI/CIA before they are fully disbanded. travelingthrulife Sunday #1
RIGHT HERE !!! 👆🏿👆🏿👆🏿 uponit7771 Sunday #40
Yes tintinvotes Sunday #2
No Abnredleg Sunday #3
? tintinvotes Sunday #5
Not for voting data Abnredleg Sunday #7
Proof? tintinvotes Sunday #9
The County in question denies your claim Abnredleg Sunday #10
So no investigation? tintinvotes Sunday #13
Sorry, but the burden of proof just shifted Abnredleg Sunday #17
Trust, but don't verify tintinvotes Sunday #24
You need probable cause for an investigation Abnredleg Sunday #28
Probable Cause tintinvotes Sunday #33
Right... People keep moving the goal post uponit7771 Sunday #36
No - people keep expanding the conspiracy Abnredleg Sunday #45
I want investigation into **ANY** involvement you want investigation into an element of ... uponit7771 Sunday #47
Send a tip to the FBI or DOJ. DiamondShark Sunday #85
I trust the experts on this Abnredleg Sunday #44
Like these experts? tintinvotes Sunday #46
The Cyber Ninjas were "experts" Abnredleg Sunday #53
Precedent tintinvotes Sunday #69
We're better than the GOP Abnredleg Sunday #77
Always verify tintinvotes Sunday #82
An AI authored article is your evidence???? AZSkiffyGeek Sunday #55
Do you have a link for this? karin_sj Sunday #54
Google tintinvotes Sunday #62
So, Starlink was responsible for uploading voter registration information? Baitball Blogger Sunday #16
How would those things be related? EdmondDantes_ Sunday #18
North Carolina was not a swingstate. Baitball Blogger Sunday #20
North Carolina is considered a swing state EdmondDantes_ Sunday #51
No Abnredleg Sunday #19
You are correct LetMyPeopleVote Sunday #72
But Starlink could be used to transmit the data from the local tabulation centers to the state SOS office probably. LiberalArkie Sunday #101
Yes, but that's usually a manual process Abnredleg Sunday #103
You just admitted that starlink was used. garybeck Sunday #26
Not the case Abnredleg Sunday #30
Was star link used? Yes? ...then start investigating... eos uponit7771 Sunday #37
Why investigate the impossible? Abnredleg Sunday #38
It's impossible for star link to be involved in election in any way? I'm calling for an investigation into uponit7771 Sunday #39
You're being deliberately misleading Abnredleg Sunday #42
They sound just like the MAGATs in 2020 AZSkiffyGeek Sunday #58
Starlink, T-Mobile, AT&T, Cox, Comcast... DiamondShark Sunday #89
Almost all jurisdictions forbid connecting to Internet Abnredleg Sunday #4
The question is not at the voting machines but @ the Central Tabulators Botany Sunday #6
Same legal requirements as voting machines Abnredleg Sunday #8
The central tabulators take the precinct numbers and add them up for the state. They are a known vulnerability. garybeck Sunday #29
Tabulators are airgapped Abnredleg Sunday #31
Funny you didn't even know what a central tabulator was just a short time ago and now you know Botany Sunday #52
Because ALL election equipment is airgapped Abnredleg Sunday #57
Most of your questions could be solved by being a poll watcher. DiamondShark Sunday #106
Thank you! Botany Sunday #48
Not to mention , the memory cards garybeck Sunday #27
Which is why they have strict chain of custody requirements Abnredleg Sunday #35
Google works Sympthsical Sunday #11
DU is a wonderful resource thank you very much. Botany Sunday #12
Clearly there are some issues with factual information this week Sympthsical Sunday #14
How about presenting proof Abnredleg Sunday #15
I have done election protection work for 20 years. Botany Sunday #21
Nice meaningless diversion Abnredleg Sunday #22
I'm just looking for clues at the scene of the crime. Botany Sunday #25
I'll accept your concession Abnredleg Sunday #32
The official canvassing is days after the early count. Igel Sunday #41
All of them? I've only read generic statements from anonymous names Cetacea Monday #120
Great list of info, but guarantee more threads on the rigged election in following weeks, maybe next year or so. Silent Type Sunday #23
Some Democrats are achieving parity SCantiGOP Sunday #43
THANK YOU!!! uponit7771 Sunday #34
SNOPES says no... it's silly. WarGamer Sunday #49
No Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Sunday #50
Phone lines Autisminsight Sunday #56
I've worked in the telecommunication field for 45 years. Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Sunday #59
Lots of misinformation on this thread. Botany Sunday #74
Zipper, huh? The Revolution Sunday #96
Much like Virginia SickOfTheOnePct Sunday #111
They manually enter the data into the state system Abnredleg Sunday #60
Those are "media reports" LeftInTX Monday #114
so... this is some sort of what exactly? lapfog_1 Sunday #61
Most jurisdictions now use paper ballots Abnredleg Sunday #64
I have never met a "security protocol" that I or a sufficient talented hacker lapfog_1 Sunday #67
True Abnredleg Sunday #78
Yes... Think. Again. Sunday #63
but begs the question lapfog_1 Sunday #65
Yes, I absolutely agree this starlink election connection must be thoroughly investigated. Think. Again. Sunday #66
You have been corrected on this exact story multiple times on DU Zeitghost Sunday #68
I have certainly not been "corrected" sinc no one has clarified what.... Think. Again. Sunday #70
As it has been explained to you over and over Zeitghost Sunday #71
Yeah, I rmember reading that... Think. Again. Sunday #75
Your reading comprehension needs some work Abnredleg Sunday #79
You just wrote, in the same sentence..... Think. Again. Sunday #80
Because you are deliberately misrepresenting what I wrote Abnredleg Sunday #81
Hey, friend, I understand you are very much against basic verification of the 2024 results... Think. Again. Sunday #83
Actually, we are talking about paper data Abnredleg Sunday #84
Yes, that complaint that we shouldn't question the accuracy of ... Think. Again. Sunday #86
The checks you want are already being done Abnredleg Sunday #87
Nope, no checks are being done to look for anything except "close margins". Think. Again. Sunday #90
Here is an emergency petition link on change.org Linda ladeewolf Sunday #88
It's a petition for a coup /nt Abnredleg Sunday #91
Maybe you don't understand what a coup is? Think. Again. Sunday #93
Wow, I didn't know you had such a long history here. DiamondShark Sunday #94
Are you under the impression I started DU? Think. Again. Sunday #97
Did you? DiamondShark Sunday #107
Why do you think I've been here longer than I have? Think. Again. Sunday #108
This message was self-deleted by its author DiamondShark Sunday #109
Please post a source for your claim. DiamondShark Sunday #110
I would have to look for it... Think. Again. Sunday #112
I'll keep this post bookmarked. DiamondShark Sunday #113
Or maybe... Think. Again. Monday #115
You're hilarious. DiamondShark Monday #116
I'm pretty sure concessions have to be made first... Think. Again. Monday #117
Clearly, you can't backup a statement you made. DiamondShark Monday #118
Hey! This is interesting! Did you know about this??? Think. Again. Monday #119
Is this gaslighting? This isn't what you said the first time. DiamondShark Monday #121
Yes, you do seem to be gaslighting me.. Think. Again. Monday #122
Highlighted for readability. DiamondShark Monday #123
You're pretending there's a contradiction that doesn't exist. Think. Again. Monday #124
It was actually number 2. DiamondShark Monday #125
There is no proof of fraud Abnredleg Sunday #95
You are erroneously speaking for other people... Think. Again. Sunday #98
And they won't speak out Abnredleg Sunday #99
So you admit you were lying when you said... Think. Again. Sunday #100
They all issued statements accepting the election. Abnredleg Sunday #102
Again, none of those people have made any public statements on the matter we are discussing.... Think. Again. Sunday #104
A snip from that petition soandso Sunday #105
Thank you! Think. Again. Sunday #92
FACT FOCUS: Election officials knock down Starlink vote rigging conspiracy theories LetMyPeopleVote Sunday #73
You mean from all the lawsuits of bamboo ballots in 2021? bucolic_frolic Sunday #76
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Yes or no did Starlink up...»Reply #124