General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: That Spoonamore guy who wrote the "Duty to Warn" letter is going to be on Thom Hartmann in about 10 minutes. [View all]muriel_volestrangler
(102,897 posts)I said "I hadn't seen any facts about how hacks were done on DU. I've seen that he's suggested ways hacks could happen, but not that they actually had. I've seen DUers gone on for ages about the numbers." and you replied " yes, that's exactly why recounts must be done". So, please explain why a lack of facts on DU is a reason for a recount.
I asked you "What are these "many indications"?" and you haven't tried to back up your assertion. So, again, what are these "many indications"?
Did you advocate for a mass recount in 2020? 2012? 2008? If not, why do you think those counts were secure, but not in 2024?
Yes, just like the Democratic party, I'm resistant to demanding a recount without any evidence. Maybe I'll remind you of that in the future.