Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
39. Steven Spoonamore on The Thom Hartmann Program Live (11/18/2024) - 02:16:30 - 02:28:45 ----------
Tue Nov 19, 2024, 11:15 AM
Nov 19

Steven Spoonamore on The Thom Hartmann Program Live (11/18/2024) - 02:16:30 - 02:28:45 -



The Steven Spoonamore interview starts at approx. 02:16:30 to 02:28:45. [link:https://www.youtube.com/live/5s4iCxtf_Js

https://www.youtube.com/@thomhartmann/videos - https://www.thomhartmann.com/


Data Scientist's Shocking Call for Election Recount Raises Scary Questions! w/ Stephen Spoonamore
[ link: https://wwwDOTyoutubeDOTcom/watch?v=RJR5uQpweko ]

Stephen Spoonamore - Duty to Warn Letter - to VP Harris - Re: Election 2024 - Nov 15, 2024 - https://substack.com/home/post/p-151721941

https://freespeechforpeople.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/letter-to-vp-harris-111324.pdf
November 15, 2024
Honorable VP Kamala Harris
The White House
Office of the Vice President
1600 Pennsylvania Ave
Washington DC 20500
Dear Madam Vice President.
This is my second Duty to Warn Letter regarding hacking of the 2024 Presidential Election. The first letter on November 7 was directed to Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Officials. Both warnings are made per DNI Clapper’s 2015 directive to all agencies and contractors associated with intelligence and financial agency technologies to warn of suspicions of hacking.
Professionally I have worked as the CEO or CTO at seven high technology firms including two which specialized in hacking and counter-hacking operations. My clients have included numerous governments DoD, DHS, Dept. of State, F100 Financials and F500 Industrials.
I am a lifelong Republican who has long placed service and participatory democracy over party. In government, I have twice been invited to SoCom to give lectures on electronic warfare and techniques to find terrorist money laundering and gave a keynote speech of the National Counterintel Summit on this same topic. I served as an after-action reviewer of communications and data failures on 9/11 under the direction of Jim Woolsey and FDNY Commissioner Scopetta, and later co-wrote multiple hacking risk analysis of Smart Grid technologies for the Obama administration.
You should reverse your concession, call for both a full investigation of criminal activity and demand hand recounts in all seven swing states.
In my professional view there are multiple and extremely clear indications the Presidential vote was willfully compromised.
I wholly agree with the public letter of Duncan Buell, et. al. of Nov. 13th stating they believe there is a possibility of hacking and calling for hand-recounts.
https://freespeechforpeople.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/letter-to-vp-harris-111324.pdf
This letter’s clear call to action is commendable, but its cautious tone may belie the severity of what I believe has happened. In my view it is a near certainty the results have been changed at a scale which reversed the US Presidential Election. They imply there is a chance a hand-recount will show you won more votes. I am stating a hand recount will most likely show you did win. Both letters call on you to act.
In my view, a capable and skilled series of exploits, electronic tools and hacks were used to change the Presidential vote in all seven swing states. These activities have reversed the outcomes in at least Arizona, Michigan, North Carolina, and Wisconsin. I will lay out the basics of the attack, starting with unusual elements within the results. I will then outline two processes which could have been followed to insert these false results into the system. Finally I will outline how I would recommend investigating.
Unusual elements within the results.
The results of the attack are improbable in the extreme and well tailored to the sole benefit of your opponent.
Approximately 600,000 votes are for Donald Trump but with no down ballot choices. These are either inserted “bullet ballots” for the Presidential race or manipulated data fields. They are surgically added to totals in limited jurisdictions and within only the seven swing States. This historically unprecedented set of numbers found in the 2024 swing states is absent in every other state. In AZ, MI, NC and WI the effect of these drop-off votes reverses the voters' will and even more improbably always pushes the winning margin beyond the mandatory recount numbers. It is a result too perfect for belief. It is a bespoke and programmed outcome. In other states including PA and NV, removing these strange and bespoke added votes, it appears Donald Trump may have won the cast votes but within a margin which would force recounts. The inserted votes raise his totals, to avoid any scrutiny during mandatory recount results which would have slowed his claim on the Presidency. In GA and FL the same pattern exists with unclear impact on the results.
This attack is not technically difficult. It is modest in scale. It would require:
Modest and common computer programming skills.
Access to 10-100 tabulators or to the handful of facilities programming them in advance.
A credible database of voter IDs of non-voters around which to create false ballots.
Perhaps as few as 1, but more likely 3-5 human program managers.
Access to eBollBook Data during the election to determine who had not voted.
(Possibly) Human access to some tabulators during counting.
If I was asked to lead this hack, I would expect to have a core team of 6-10 people, and operating costs under $10M with a timeline of 3-12 months.
The tell: A historically absurd number of Trump-only bullet ballots or undervote ballots.
There are always a handful of voters who cast a vote in one race which they care about, and do not make other selections on the ballot. These are called bullet ballots. In Presidential Races since 1980, these bullet ballots rarely account for more than 1% of the total votes including in Mr. Trump’s winning 2016 election and losing 2020 election, and when they do it warrants further investigation. In 2024 in the 43 non-swing states, bullet ballots make up a nominal >1%. In the seven swing states the numbers are so high to be unbelievable, unprecedented and demanding of further investigation. Here is analysis from totals as of late Nov. 12th
Here are the unprecedented results of drop-offs in the two western swing states:
AZ - 123K+ 7.2%+ of Trump’s total vote. Enough to reverse the outcome.
NV - 43K+ 5.5%+ of Trump’s total vote. Enough to exceed recount threshold.
It is my belief these two states have illegally added votes.
For comparison, examine Trump’s 2024 results in three states which border AZ and NV. They have equally passionate Trump supporters, but have the normal levels of drop off or bullet ballots.
ID

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I can't really doubt his allegations... Think. Again. Nov 18 #1
He seems to have pulled his numbers from thin air muriel_volestrangler Nov 18 #3
His number estimates aren't important... Think. Again. Nov 18 #4
I hadn't seen any facts about how hacks were done on DU muriel_volestrangler Nov 18 #5
yes, that's exactly why recounts must be done... Think. Again. Nov 18 #7
Harris is a "true Dem," no? It's pretty easy to understand why she is not pushing recounts. tritsofme Nov 18 #10
You really shouldn't make up things that other people said. Think. Again. Nov 18 #11
Of course she hasn't. Why would she address baseless conspiracy theories floating around the fringes of the internet? tritsofme Nov 18 #16
Then people should not put words in her mouth. Think. Again. Nov 18 #17
I didn't put any words in her mouth. I said she is not pushing recounts, and she is not. tritsofme Nov 18 #18
I'm sure she is quite capable of keeping quite about any plans she may have. Think. Again. Nov 18 #20
lol, the conspiracy theory takes another turn! tritsofme Nov 18 #25
You might be trying to dig a rabbit hole. Think. Again. Nov 18 #27
Some folks are certainly down deep in one. tritsofme Nov 18 #29
Recounts must be done because there haven't been any facts about the hacks on DU? muriel_volestrangler Nov 18 #22
Your resistence to verifying the first-count results is noted. Think. Again. Nov 18 #28
Look, I'm responding to your posts. Please respond to mine. muriel_volestrangler Nov 18 #30
Perhaps this short interview today with Steven Spoonamore himself... Think. Again. Nov 18 #31
No, it doesn't. He starts off with a hypothetical without evidence muriel_volestrangler Nov 18 #32
You can't argue with willfully ignorance asm128 Nov 19 #38
I'm trying to find some exit polls and the regular polls close to the election. kerry-is-my-prez Nov 18 #34
How are the "estimates" not important when they are supposedly the trigger for the alarm? TheKentuckian Nov 19 #36
What SHOULD trigger the alarm... Think. Again. Nov 19 #37
wish there was... 2naSalit Nov 18 #2
Can anyone supply a link to this segment? Think. Again. Nov 18 #6
Here's a youtube link, 3-hour show, Spoonamore is at the beginning of the third hour. CoopersDad Nov 18 #8
Thank you! Think. Again. Nov 18 #12
Steven Spoonamore on The Thom Hartmann Program Live (11/18/2024) - 02:16:30 - 02:28:45 ---------- ConcernedCitizen1776 Nov 19 #39
Spoonamore said that the only person who can ask for a recount is Kamala Harris. I am going to write to my senator LaMouffette Nov 18 #9
i posted a couple different things after the show orleans Nov 18 #13
I can't believe folks are blindly buying this bullet ballot bullshit. onenote Nov 18 #14
With all due respect... ElementaryPenguin Nov 18 #23
With all due respect, the numbers speak for themselves onenote Nov 18 #26
Also, apparently a candidate must wait... Think. Again. Nov 18 #15
I found Spoonamore extremely credible ElementaryPenguin Nov 18 #19
K&R Think. Again. Nov 18 #21
Did he explain how he determined the number of "bullet ballots"? onenote Nov 18 #24
I did a search for Spoonamore on DU and this 16 year old thread came up EarlG Nov 18 #33
Here's the video from the show: Rhiannon12866 Nov 19 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»That Spoonamore guy who w...»Reply #39