Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Olivia Troye's attorney has responded to Kash Patel's demand for a retraction [View all]TomSlick
(11,973 posts)31. I don't claim to be a first-class lawyer but
I always proof read, and have my assistant proof read, everything that goes out of the office over my signature. Even so, errors are sometimes missed. Every now and then, someone will point out the error and I apologize profusely if insincerely.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Olivia Troye's attorney has responded to Kash Patel's demand for a retraction [View all]
LetMyPeopleVote
Dec 6
OP
I'm reminded of the partner who would send scathing "fuck you" letters this time of year,
rsdsharp
Dec 6
#12
Your point? Your link does not support the usage in the letter, not one bit
Bernardo de La Paz
Dec 6
#30
I'd assumed he meant swath (or even swathe) too, but that link does support this uncommon usage:
Emrys
Dec 6
#36
'Monty Python enters the chat': National Security expert scoffs at FBI nominee's threat
LetMyPeopleVote
Dec 7
#54