Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ocelot II

(122,381 posts)
8. Yes, didn't they say they weren't going to do endorsements any more?
Mon Jan 13, 2025, 11:39 AM
Jan 13

Technically I guess these aren't endorsement because this collection of stooges, sycophants and bottom-feeders aren't running for elected office, but WaPo singled out the low-hanging fruit that even some GOPers would find unacceptable - and then struggled to find reasons why the rest of them are sort of OK. Most of those reasons are downright risible.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ken Klippenstein: WaPo Ed...»Reply #8