Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

msfiddlestix

(7,911 posts)
49. really? I missed that factoid. Regardless, I knew Garland was the wrong pick during his pathetic confirmation hearing
Tue Jan 14, 2025, 12:11 PM
23 hrs ago

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What a fucking disgrace. Autumn Yesterday #1
He managed to convict Hunter of what most of the Maga gun owners do, Bluethroughu 12 hrs ago #88
Textbook example of "Justice delayed is justice denied" (Gladstone). sop Yesterday #2
I was thinking... 2naSalit Yesterday #3
He really should have known better Bluetus Yesterday #35
What are you talking about? dpibel Yesterday #41
What I'm saying is that he spread himself so thin with such a grandiose bag of charges Bluetus 22 hrs ago #57
Why Are You Blaming Smith For The Problems Caused By Roberts? DallasNE 11 hrs ago #89
"Should have been enough time" Bluetus 11 hrs ago #92
Silly. H2O Man 11 hrs ago #90
Two more words edhopper Yesterday #4
The entire effin system failed malaise Yesterday #5
Aint that the truth! edhopper Yesterday #10
+1 Dave Bowman 23 hrs ago #51
He should have been cuffed and taken away on 1/6/21. Haggard Celine 17 hrs ago #81
That simplr malaise 16 hrs ago #83
And now I predict he's going to "run for his life" and "hide" somewhere. Justice matters. Yesterday #8
Depends VBNMW 19 hrs ago #68
My 2 words: Garland won. MLAA Yesterday #6
Thank you. William769 Yesterday #7
I don't think he means edhopper Yesterday #11
I meant my post to suggest that in retrospect I think Garland intentionally slow rolled the federal cases against TFG MLAA Yesterday #15
Yes edhopper Yesterday #21
Thanks for your clarification, the only other explanation for Garland's supreme failure is that he is not very bright MLAA Yesterday #30
OR VBNMW 20 hrs ago #67
It's possible, but I lean more toward Biden choosing not to fire Garland due to the optics of firing the AG who brought MLAA 19 hrs ago #74
The problems with GOP, the courts and political crimes are deeper PufPuf23 11 hrs ago #91
Indeed MLAA 2 hrs ago #95
I have asked homegirl Yesterday #38
Enquiring minds (like ours) want to know! MLAA Yesterday #42
I think they brought their own hookers. Maru Kitteh 22 hrs ago #59
O. M. G. calimary 18 hrs ago #78
The people funding that were Republicans, if not purebred Nazis Bluetus 21 hrs ago #60
The ONLY thing I have seen is that Drumpf allowed them to stay free at his hotel. Zero beyond that. Nice job DOJ.... Evolve Dammit 17 hrs ago #79
That may very well be. William769 Yesterday #19
You mean that Garland isn't an abject failure edhopper Yesterday #22
This message was self-deleted by its author MLAA Yesterday #25
To me Garlands detractors are abject failure William769 Yesterday #31
Biden says edhopper Yesterday #34
... orangecrush 19 hrs ago #76
I was a vocal supporter of Garland's until the last 6 months or so. MLAA Yesterday #12
Thank you for the clarification. William769 Yesterday #18
This message was self-deleted by its author AKwannabe Yesterday #43
How about DENVERPOPS 17 hrs ago #80
Yep. Two months before the election instead of two months after would have been nice. still-prayin4rain Yesterday #9
Too Late dalton99a Yesterday #13
I think the 2nd report will be more damaging Johonny Yesterday #14
Totally agree! dmr Yesterday #17
The second investigation focused on the possession of highly classified documents at Mar-a-Lago. sop Yesterday #32
This is the one I. want people to see MadameButterfly Yesterday #39
I'm afraid my opinion of the GOP is low enough that I'll need to see them not ignoring it... JHB 23 hrs ago #45
You're right, they'll all die on that hill defending Trump. sop 23 hrs ago #50
"It will be difficult for Republicans to ignore & defend..." Nah, they'll make it look easy. n/t Beartracks 20 hrs ago #65
When the 2nd report shows Trump shared top secret documents with the shady foreign nationals who hang sop 20 hrs ago #66
It will be totally easy J-9 16 hrs ago #82
"Blah blah witchhunt blah blah weaponized justice system blah blah..." The usual shit schtick. Beartracks 16 hrs ago #84
Is a second report confirmed? msfiddlestix 23 hrs ago #48
Biden could release it this afternoon. Bluetus 21 hrs ago #61
The 2nd report will not be released officially. totodeinhere 19 hrs ago #69
Think about this gab13by13 Yesterday #16
I didn't know that. dmr Yesterday #24
From Politico, 2017: JHB 22 hrs ago #54
Thank you. Like you, I figured Biden chose Garland dmr 21 hrs ago #64
really? I missed that factoid. Regardless, I knew Garland was the wrong pick during his pathetic confirmation hearing msfiddlestix 23 hrs ago #49
Something is inherently wrong with a legal system that can't prosecute cases in four years. lees1975 Yesterday #20
I am sorry, but have to agree on this one. True Blue American Yesterday #29
LOL VBNMW 19 hrs ago #71
another 2 words bdamomma Yesterday #23
Or 3 words woodsprite Yesterday #26
Which is precisely why Trump sought, and the courts provided, delay after delay Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #27
"Garland Delayed". Think. Again. Yesterday #28
Merrick Garland, a name that will live in infamy. Borogove Yesterday #33
**NEVER** Trust a Republican... NEVER uponit7771 Yesterday #36
A truth beyond has never been truer. Butterflylady 23 hrs ago #44
We were promised.. VBNMW 19 hrs ago #72
I don't see orangecrush 19 hrs ago #77
Any chance whatsoever Democrats learned a lesson from all this?? I am not holding my breath. NoMoreRepugs Yesterday #37
Absolutely VBNMW 19 hrs ago #73
"Treason coverup". They did not release the half about documents case. lostnfound Yesterday #40
TRAITOR WALKS Kid Berwyn 23 hrs ago #46
I guess FOUR YEARS wasn't long enough . . . Emile 23 hrs ago #47
Three: He did it! NM Grins 23 hrs ago #52
Yup, time did matter. republianmushroom 22 hrs ago #53
Yep, Too Late IbogaProject 22 hrs ago #55
I don't think this report would have impacted the election HereForTheParty 22 hrs ago #56
Absolutely the case. Nothing new here. Bluetus 21 hrs ago #62
It -might- have gotten more Dems & Independents to vote for Kamala. electric_blue68 13 hrs ago #85
This again. nt Drum 22 hrs ago #58
Hope springs eternal stillcool 21 hrs ago #63
Wow, now folks are bashing Jack Smith? You are kidding, right? This is a GOP dream... Joinfortmill 19 hrs ago #70
Thom Hartmann made a point in the third hour of today's program Mike 03 19 hrs ago #75
At least Garland avoided the appearance of a political agenda Orrex 13 hrs ago #86
I remember a time when the US media were full of . . . Aussie105 12 hrs ago #87
"Too big to jail" n/t King_Klonopin 10 hrs ago #93
I never put a hero label on people anymore. But I surprised at the hate for Smith here: Cannon was the problem. C Moon 7 hrs ago #94
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jack Smith's Report Can B...»Reply #49