Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

DeepWinter

(931 posts)

3. I think you answered

Reply to RJ-MacReady (Original post)

Mon Feb 24, 2025, 11:11 AM

Feb 2025

your own question.

If protestors are violating the law and being physical, they will be reponded to physically. (in the act of arrest)

If they are peacefully protesting (peacefull can be quite loud and angry) then they should be in the clear. What is being protested is almost irrelavant.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

blue states and anti choice protestors [View all] RJ-MacReady Feb 2025 OP

Physical force by whom? Why only blue states? WhiskeyGrinder Feb 2025 #1

red states wouldn't care RJ-MacReady Feb 2025 #2

Different states have different laws about self-defense, but the burden of proof is on the person defending themselves. WhiskeyGrinder Feb 2025 #6

I think you answered DeepWinter Feb 2025 #3

agreed RJ-MacReady Feb 2025 #5

Unfortunately, feeling harassed and threatened is not the same as being harassed and threatened, legally. WhiskeyGrinder Feb 2025 #7

Here in New Haven, we provided escorts for women seeking our care against the protesters. CTyankee Feb 2025 #9

Unless it arises to fighting words exboyfil Feb 2025 #4

Blue states should pay for armed security guards DBoon Feb 2025 #8

Good answer 👍 MustLoveBeagles Feb 2025 #10

I have said for years drmeow Feb 2025 #11

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»blue states and anti choi...»Reply #3