Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

angrychair

(10,723 posts)
31. This is an outrageous statement
Thu Mar 13, 2025, 11:13 AM
Mar 2025

Implying that someone won't vote for the Democrat because that isn't what was said. Also find it interesting that you ignored his anti-trans position. Any time you are punching down to a small, already marginalized group and using them as a scapegoat, you already lost me.
Also TSF won't be on the ballot ever again. To imply otherwise is ridiculous.
For me I already stated down thread that I would not vote for him in a primary and I would advocate for just about ANY Democratic Party candidate but him. No matter what I have and will always vote for the Democratic Party nominee.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Now maybe explain why he ordered all CA workers back to offices & why he dissed trans people? SheltieLover Mar 2025 #1
When did he order CA workers back to office? NavyDem Mar 2025 #11
It was within the past week that I saw a post here on DU SheltieLover Mar 2025 #13
Here is a news story about this SheltieLover Mar 2025 #14
Thank You for the Link. NavyDem Mar 2025 #63
You are most welcome! SheltieLover Mar 2025 #65
Purity test: work from home. Got it Bobstandard Mar 2025 #20
This is an outrageous statement angrychair Mar 2025 #31
Seems pretty clear to me Bobstandard Mar 2025 #41
My position on trans rights stands angrychair Mar 2025 #44
Exactly! It's not just one issue, but several, the trans comment among them. SheltieLover Mar 2025 #47
What did he say that ia anti-tran? I keep reading that he's anti-tran... brush Mar 2025 #52
I definitely would not vote for tfg! SheltieLover Mar 2025 #45
What does this mean? Are you saying on a Dem site you would vote for trump? brush Mar 2025 #54
Sorry, typos fixed. SheltieLover Mar 2025 #58
Possibly positioning himself for a presidential run SpankMe Mar 2025 #40
He's doing it wrong politically. He's gotta get through a primary. LeftInTX Mar 2025 #57
What did he say that dissed trans people? brush Mar 2025 #51
If he's the candidate, I'll vote for him, but I won't vote for him in the primary Meowmee Mar 2025 #64
Gavin doesn't come from a place of insecurity of his own political ideology, he wants to bridge that gap to find.... Omnipresent Mar 2025 #2
Exactly Meadowoak Mar 2025 #4
We know what drives it Keepthesoulalive Mar 2025 #5
Apparently not. Omnipresent Mar 2025 #7
They have told us why they vote against their interests Keepthesoulalive Mar 2025 #9
The 'Right' Is Wholly Fascist -- The 'Right' Is Driven By Malevlence And Delusion MayReasonRule Mar 2025 #19
Thank you!! nt LAS14 Mar 2025 #23
Fish? or Turds? johnnyfins Mar 2025 #22
Is that his excuse? Weird. Think. Again. Mar 2025 #15
It is no different from Buttigieg going on Fox regularly Bluetus Mar 2025 #21
Sorry Chi67 Mar 2025 #25
What did he say to throw trans people under the bus? brush Mar 2025 #56
Nothing. He simply made it clear fighting about 5 cases a year of trans in sports Bluetus Mar 2025 #60
I agree Omnipresent Mar 2025 #28
It's the exact opposite of Pete, a Dem, going on Fox Phoenix61 Mar 2025 #38
Newsom is the opposite of Major Pete pinkstarburst Mar 2025 #49
We don't need anyone angrychair Mar 2025 #39
Except that then Mayor Newsom kicked off the whole same sex marriage triumph dickthegrouch Mar 2025 #42
I don't agree with giving platforms to human monsters. NewHendoLib Mar 2025 #3
Totally agree LearnedHand Mar 2025 #6
I just think that the political bubble has created naivety among so many of our "leaders" NewHendoLib Mar 2025 #8
Especially human monsters who have no legitimate place in the country's discourse. Who is Steve Bannon? Scrivener7 Mar 2025 #10
there is his Biodome bullshit - an early example of his assholiness NewHendoLib Mar 2025 #12
I agree, NHL! SheltieLover Mar 2025 #50
Co-signed. n/t demmiblue Mar 2025 #61
Maybe Controversial TBA Mar 2025 #16
K & R nt berniesandersmittens Mar 2025 #17
Andy Richter ‪@andyrichter.co‬ MayReasonRule Mar 2025 #18
Well stated!! Succinct and true. nt LAS14 Mar 2025 #24
No way angrychair Mar 2025 #26
He knows that we need to have a conversation with each other as humans which is correct SSJVegeta Mar 2025 #27
What better way to talk to them than to host people they flock to listen to? nt LAS14 Mar 2025 #29
Truth. SSJVegeta Mar 2025 #33
Just no. pinkstarburst Mar 2025 #30
If we can't engage and defend our policies, then what would that say about our policies, and how should we everyonematters Mar 2025 #32
Yikes! This thread has turned into a verbal fist fight. Joinfortmill Mar 2025 #34
I have never had very strong feelings one way or the other about Newsom, but I Celerity Mar 2025 #37
I think it shows breathtaking naivety about our NewHendoLib Mar 2025 #53
It's worth talking to people like Bannon radius777 Mar 2025 #35
I've been retired now for over 20 years and ... walkingman Mar 2025 #36
Sounds fine to me BannonsLiver Mar 2025 #43
So, you'd be okay with talking to people who were against the war in Gaza? Yavin4 Mar 2025 #48
So, is he going to have people on who didn't vote for the Democrats because of Gaza? Yavin4 Mar 2025 #46
Why are democrats always the only ones being asked to reach out? I guess Gavin never heard Cowboys for Trump Hotler Mar 2025 #55
There is only one form of communication fascists responds to. The Grand Illuminist Mar 2025 #59
I like Gavin flamingdem Mar 2025 #62
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Newsom explains why he ha...»Reply #31