Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

EarlG

(23,303 posts)
23. Since you are directly quoting me in your OP, I will respond
Sat Mar 15, 2025, 01:34 PM
Mar 2025
"Democratic leadership looks weak and unfocused."

Yes, that is my quote. Now, I *didn't* say that Democratic leaders are "just a bunch of cowards who need to get a clue!" although you have included that alongside my quote.

That's verbatim what some here believe is just fine to post to me here about Democrats, as if I'm some kind of abstraction, a dart board just because I exclusively advocate for and defend Democrats on a site named Democratic Underground. The nerve of me.

If you can't handle hearing someone say something as mild as "Democratic leadership looks weak and unfocused," then clearly this is not going to be the place for you for the foreseeable future.

When you say, "That's verbatim what some here believe is just fine to post," the "some here" you are talking about is me, the person who owns the site and set its policies. And yes, I do think that it's just fine to post "Democratic leadership looks weak and unfocused," because over the last 24-48 hours, they have looked weak and unfocused.

To be clear, I *don't* think it's fine to say that Democrats are "just a bunch of cowards who need to get a clue!" -- but I didn't say that, nor would I. In fact, I would likely vote to remove it if I were on Jury for it. (Although it seems that plenty of other DUers are clearly in the mood to let that sort of thing slide at the moment.)

You will have noticed that during General Election season last year, I held completely firm to the DU policy that members are not allowed to criticize the Democratic nominee, and I stuck to that policy in the face of half the site wanting Joe Biden to drop out. A number of people ended up taking time away from DU during that period -- or even getting banned because they could not control themselves -- which was unfortunate, but it happened because I stuck to the policy which we have had in place for a couple of decades, and I stand by that policy.

But when we are NOT in General Election season, the standard is different. There is no better time for the party to rebuild and discuss a path forward than immediately after a big election loss, which is where we are right now. We have *always* had these types of conversation at Democratic Underground outside of General Election season, and that is also not going to change.

I will finish by saying that people who continually post insults and yell obscenities at Democrats are certainly taking a chance -- the more they do it, the more likely it is that they will get posts removed, and if they can't control themselves, they'll run into the same problem as the people who couldn't control themselves during General Election season.
I completely understand your feelings on this. MineralMan Mar 2025 #1
All good resons to boycott anti-Democratic posts and threads. Beastly Boy Mar 2025 #2
I understand. Our waters are uncharted. Without Ninga Mar 2025 #3
alerts and juries **nt DoBW Mar 2025 #4
Have fun! William769 Mar 2025 #5
That's nice. Nanjeanne Mar 2025 #6
I wouldn't want to be in a forum that *didn't* allow criticism of Democrats HereForTheParty Mar 2025 #7
Didn't you angrily leave after the big switch last summer only to return 20 minutes later? BannonsLiver Mar 2025 #8
🤫🫢ooooops! Traildogbob Mar 2025 #27
Deny reality and... lame54 Mar 2025 #9
I share your distress at the vitriol being flung at Schumer and co, but... LAS14 Mar 2025 #10
I totally agree gab13by13 Mar 2025 #11
Vaya con dios JoseBalow Mar 2025 #12
Too bad VanceFan Mar 2025 #13
Yep LW1977 Mar 2025 #28
Big tent. NewHendoLib Mar 2025 #14
Blind loyalty is no good. alarimer Mar 2025 #15
Sorry Good bye then IrishBubbaLiberal Mar 2025 #16
The drama of it all! demmiblue Mar 2025 #17
The leadership doesn't need your protection and no one here needs to be controlled. Duncan Grant Mar 2025 #18
Well said! You should reply more often, lol! ms liberty Mar 2025 #31
I hope you will reconsider. I think your views are needed here. chowder66 Mar 2025 #19
It's a hard habit to break... stillcool Mar 2025 #20
MAGA controls the House, Senate, and POTUS. New leadership is EXACTLY what we needed, I'm sorry you can't see it krawhitham Mar 2025 #21
We are at a crossroads as a party senseandsensibility Mar 2025 #22
Since you are directly quoting me in your OP, I will respond EarlG Mar 2025 #23
Interesting. Yavin4 Mar 2025 #26
Post removed Post removed Mar 2025 #30
Thank you for this post. Clear, concise and definitive! ms liberty Mar 2025 #38
hasta la vista, dude republianmushroom Mar 2025 #24
You caught me off guard. William769 Mar 2025 #29
Okay. H2O Man Mar 2025 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author LW1977 Mar 2025 #32
I don't see eye to eye with the OP but William769 Mar 2025 #35
You are such a good man. ms liberty Mar 2025 #40
Goodbye Greyhead Mar 2025 #33
Are you saying it isn't acceptable, or even a GOOD thing... Think. Again. Mar 2025 #34
This sounds a lot like, "America, love it or leave it" and "My country, right or wrong." Ping Tung Mar 2025 #36
Sometimes the status quo isn't the answer, change is what is called for. jalan48 Mar 2025 #37
Well... you do you FoggyLake Mar 2025 #39
Well... Bye LW1977 Mar 2025 #41
Nothing says "democratic" like intolerance of criticizing/questioning the Dear Leaders RockRaven Mar 2025 #42
We are loyal to our country first. hadEnuf Mar 2025 #43
How about campaigning FOR better Democratic leadership? Martin Eden Mar 2025 #44
I think EarlG and H20Man said everything that was needed. ms liberty Mar 2025 #45
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...»Reply #23