Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Marc Elias: 🚨BREAKING: Federal Court GRANTS motion to HALT deportation under rarely invoked Alien Enemies Act of 1798 [View all]mahatmakanejeeves
(64,841 posts)13. Trump Administration Appears to Launch 'Alien Enemies Act' Deportation Program
Trump Administration Appears to Launch ‘Alien Enemies Act’ Deportation Program
by Ryan Goodman
March 15, 2025
{snip}
The use of the Alien Enemies Act is not consistent with the text of the statute or past U.S. practice dating to the WWII era (the last time it was invoked) and earlier, according to legal experts. By its terms, the Act applies only when there is a “declared war between the United States and any foreign nation or government” or an “invasion” perpetrated “against the territory of the United States by any foreign nation or government.”
“The constitutional text makes clear that invasion refers to an actual attack,” wrote Ilya Somin, a law professor at the Antonin Scalia Law School at George Mason University. (1) “The absurdity” of the administration’s position “becomes even more clear when we recall that the invasion provisions of the Constitution – especially the Guarantee Clause – were understood to protect not only against foreign invasion, but against invasions of one state by another.” It is unclear how the administration could lawfully assert that the Venezuelan gang could constitute a “foreign nation or government” for purposes of the Act.
{snip}
by Ryan Goodman
March 15, 2025
{snip}
The use of the Alien Enemies Act is not consistent with the text of the statute or past U.S. practice dating to the WWII era (the last time it was invoked) and earlier, according to legal experts. By its terms, the Act applies only when there is a “declared war between the United States and any foreign nation or government” or an “invasion” perpetrated “against the territory of the United States by any foreign nation or government.”
“The constitutional text makes clear that invasion refers to an actual attack,” wrote Ilya Somin, a law professor at the Antonin Scalia Law School at George Mason University. (1) “The absurdity” of the administration’s position “becomes even more clear when we recall that the invasion provisions of the Constitution – especially the Guarantee Clause – were understood to protect not only against foreign invasion, but against invasions of one state by another.” It is unclear how the administration could lawfully assert that the Venezuelan gang could constitute a “foreign nation or government” for purposes of the Act.
{snip}
(1)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Marc Elias: 🚨BREAKING: Federal Court GRANTS motion to HALT deportation under rarely invoked Alien Enemies Act of 1798 [View all]
highplainsdem
Mar 15
OP
Trump Administration Appears to Launch 'Alien Enemies Act' Deportation Program
mahatmakanejeeves
Mar 15
#13
It's just like the Orange Hellbeast to assume that he has the right to redefine "attack"...
ShazzieB
Mar 15
#22
DOJ is arguing Trump can unilaterally deport anyone he chooses, without any statutory authority
IrishBubbaLiberal
Mar 15
#15
I think this will open the door at a minimum to denial of due process, and not just what is happening to with these
JohnSJ
Mar 15
#16
Feeling like reparations to Japanese Americans mightve been a great time to repeal it.
SSJVegeta
Mar 15
#28