Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

OldBaldy1701E

(7,987 posts)

5. "The Trump administration has not said why Alawieh was detained, or why she was removed from the country..."

Reply to In It to Win It (Original post)

Mon Mar 17, 2025, 06:47 AM

Mar 17

Go check her social media and see what she has been posting about that orange gibbon and his fellow poo flingers. I bet she has had a few things to say about his antics. Plus, once they looked into her, they say that she had a good reputation and was a smart female.

I suspect that was what pushed them over the edge. I also wonder which of the grunts in the administration has a beef with either her and/or Brown. Being an Ivy League school, their hate is palpable since they do not like anyone learning unless it leads to more wage slaves.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge demands Trump admin. explain why doctor was deported despite order [View all] In It to Win It Mar 17 OP

Quotas cause ugly things to happen. Hugin Mar 17 #1

"Because we're the executive office. Fuck you!" -Dump's admin, probably sakabatou Mar 17 #2

Trump gives big middle finger to the courts while waving his immunity card with the other hand. aeromanKC Mar 17 #3

And they get the added bonus of getting to punish a woman Walleye Mar 17 #4

"The Trump administration has not said why Alawieh was detained, or why she was removed from the country..." OldBaldy1701E Mar 17 #5

The SC declared that a President is immune from prosecution when exercising the 'core powers' of the presidency. Emile Mar 17 #6

A guy on Twitter (Currently known as X) wrote ... aggiesal Mar 17 #7

You're response is true in theory, but it's looking like it's no longer true in practice anymore. TheRickles Mar 17 #8

Until Proven To Be Otherwise... De Facto Don't Matter - DeJeure's The 'Real Jake' MayReasonRule Mar 17 #9

The most transparent kacekwl Mar 17 #10

Maybe the Supreme court should be asked to bluestarone Mar 17 #11