Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ms. Toad

(37,018 posts)
4. I'm less concerned about pro bono legal services (which most law firms do anyway),
Fri Mar 21, 2025, 05:38 PM
Mar 21

than I am about (1) agreeing to an outside (likely biased) investigation of hiring practices and (2) its admission of wrongdoing (which no one seems to be reporting on in any substantial manner).

The White House said that Mr. Karp had acknowledged “wrongdoing” by one of the firm’s former partners, Mark F. Pomerantz. Mr. Pomerantz had tried to build a criminal case against Mr. Trump several years ago while working at the Manhattan district attorney’s office. It was not clear what wrongdoing Mr. Trump was referring to.


https://archive.li/VOzqQ#selection-945.0-945.326

Pomerantz denied any wrongdoing, but nothing in the NYT article suggests Karp disagreed with the White House Statement asserting that Karp admitted wrongdoing.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump drops order against...»Reply #4