Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Ms. Toad

(36,759 posts)

7. That is an issue.

Reply to Baitball Blogger (Reply #6)

Thu Mar 27, 2025, 09:15 PM

Mar 27

Or, worse yet, consult you because they expect counsel from the other side of the matter they are consulting on might want to hire you - for the sole purpose of conflicting you out as opposing counsel.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

You do realize that Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP [View all] no_hypocrisy Mar 27 OP

effing cowards appease the tyrant without a fight nt msongs Mar 27 #1

Good point. Baitball Blogger Mar 27 #2

Some conflicts can be waived, after full disclosure. Ms. Toad Mar 27 #4

I miswrote that. I would not trust the firewall concept because I know how the good ole boy work in our Baitball Blogger Mar 27 #6

That is an issue. Ms. Toad Mar 27 #7

Yep. Baitball Blogger Mar 27 #8

They aren't doing pro bono work **for the government**. Ms. Toad Mar 27 #3

Attorneys will demand your voting record before they represent you. Irish_Dem Mar 27 #5